Nathanael Rensen wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:31:13 -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
> > Here's a version that does not rely on non-standard "sendmail -t"
> > behavior.
> >
> > - todd
>
> Much better. Works well for me, thanks.
>
> Nathanael
>
Awesome. Working here, too. Command line an
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:31:13 -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Here's a version that does not rely on non-standard "sendmail -t"
> behavior.
>
> - todd
Much better. Works well for me, thanks.
Nathanael
> Index: usr.bin/mail/cmd3.c
> ===
> From: sven falempin
> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 13:59:12 -0500
>
> Dear Tech,
>
> As you may know I am activating the watchdog function of a chip in
> my mainboard. I encouter a little problem as the current is using a
> undersize 8bit ID.
>
> Meanwhile i read about LM as it is the next logical
Here's a version that does not rely on non-standard "sendmail -t"
behavior.
- todd
Index: usr.bin/mail/cmd3.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mail/cmd3.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -r1.25 cmd3.c
--- usr.bin/mail/cmd3.c 6 Apr
Dear Tech,
As you may know I am activating the watchdog function of a chip in my mainboard.
I encouter a little problem as the current is using a undersize 8bit ID.
Meanwhile i read about LM as it is the next logical step.
In in lm78_isa.c device are 'probed' again, but the function
received th
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:37:08AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 07:24:45PM +0100, Jonas 'Sortie' Termansen wrote:
> > On 01/06/2015 12:11 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > Index: smtp_session.c
> > > ===
> > > R
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your diff! Regardless of my problem it makes our code
more clear. The loop in rt_newaddrmsg() was ugly.
>
> Here's a diff that should generate a RTM_ADD message for every CLONING
> route added while keeping the existing RTM_NEWADDR/RTM_DELADDR logic.
>
> dhclient(8) is hap
During the LibreSSL audit an old concern resurfaced -- integer
overflow in the parameters of malloc(a*b), specifically. The OpenSSH
hole of 2002 was due to the lack of overflow checking. Here is a
summary of the problem, written in 2006:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20060330071
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 12:11:40 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> I seem to recall that OpenBSD dropped -f in December (i don't know
> why), but clashing a POSIX argument doesn't seem to be a good
> idea. Heirloom mailx and S-nail use the -r option for the purpose
> in question, and i think it would
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: sven falempin
>> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:29:41 -0500
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2014/12/11 07:41, sven falempin wrote:
>> > > Thank you all,
>> > >
>> > > I grep(ed) -r NCT6 in sys and
Hello,
tro...@gmail.com wrote:
|>Sorry, my fault. Try the diff below.
|>
|>Nathanael
|
|Yup, this works! Now I can filter by sender in smptd to use the right
|SMTP server.
sorry for jumping in like that (i only get these message via
a simple NNTP-to-MBOX fetcher), yet i want to point out
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> This diff looks big but in fact there are only three changes, cnorm,
> cvvis and sgr.
Indeed.
As usual I've used:
$ sudo TERMINFO=/usr/share/terminfo tic -x rxvt-unicode.terminfo
$ infocmp rxvt-unicode
Don't know why it shuffled things
This diff looks big but in fact there are only three changes, cnorm,
cvvis and sgr.
I don't use rxvt-unicode, but it looks fine, if it's working for you
then ok nicm
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:21:39AM -0700, David Coppa wrote:
>
> Keep it in sync with rxvt-unicode-9.21.
>
> ok?
>
> Ciao,
> D
Keep it in sync with rxvt-unicode-9.21.
ok?
Ciao,
David
Index: termtypes.master
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/termtypes/termtypes.master,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.50 termtypes.master
--- termtypes.master17
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 07:24:45PM +0100, Jonas 'Sortie' Termansen wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 12:11 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Index: smtp_session.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtp_session.c,v
> > retrieving revision
I tested the patch and its working.
I have a small test program already. I create a regression test with it.
I'll post the diff here.
Am 06.01.2015 04:19 schrieb "Philip Guenther" :
> [(@#*$&(*# control-enter keybinding]
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Philip Guenther
> wrote:
> > On Mon, J
16 matches
Mail list logo