cdce(4), cue(4), kue(4) and mos(4)

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
This spring the new trend has a name: if_input() ! If you are the owner of one of these USB Ethernet dongle, please do me a favor a make sure they still work as expected with the diff below. Martin Index: if_cdce.c === RCS file:

Re: ef(4), eg(4), el(4), ex(4) and ie(4)

2015-03-26 Thread Ted Unangst
Martin Pieuchot wrote: Even our ISA Ethernet drivers can be converted to if_input(). If you still use some of these, I appreciate test reports. I'm asking here because Miod said everybody can test them... hum hum. Alternatively, if you think some drivers can go away, I'll summon tedu@.

ef(4), eg(4), el(4), ex(4) and ie(4)

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Even our ISA Ethernet drivers can be converted to if_input(). If you still use some of these, I appreciate test reports. I'm asking here because Miod said everybody can test them... hum hum. Alternatively, if you think some drivers can go away, I'll summon tedu@. Index: isa/if_ef_isapnp.c

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/03/26 13:48, Martin Pieuchot wrote: How do people feel about printing the prefixlen in CIDR notation? I'm annoyed about outputs not fitting in 80 chars when using autoconf magic: -inet6 fd00::f2de:f1ff:fe6a:15d1 prefixlen 64 autoconf pltime 3594 vltime 7194 +inet6

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: | How do people feel about printing the prefixlen in CIDR notation? I'm | annoyed about outputs not fitting in 80 chars when using autoconf magic: | | -inet6 fd00::f2de:f1ff:fe6a:15d1 prefixlen 64 autoconf pltime 3594 vltime 7194 |

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 26 March 2015 at 14:27, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: seems reasonable. (I'd quite like that for v4 too, though it wouldn't cope with non-contiguous netmask ;) non-contiguous netmasks for IPv4 addresses configured on an interface? is that possible? what's the use case? perhaps

Re: ef(4), eg(4), el(4), ex(4) and ie(4)

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 26/03/15(Thu) 08:00, Ted Unangst wrote: Martin Pieuchot wrote: Even our ISA Ethernet drivers can be converted to if_input(). If you still use some of these, I appreciate test reports. I'm asking here because Miod said everybody can test them... hum hum. Alternatively, if you

Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
How do people feel about printing the prefixlen in CIDR notation? I'm annoyed about outputs not fitting in 80 chars when using autoconf magic: -inet6 fd00::f2de:f1ff:fe6a:15d1 prefixlen 64 autoconf pltime 3594 vltime 7194 +inet6 fd00::f2de:f1ff:fe6a:15d1/64 autoconf pltime 3594 vltime 7194

Re: the libressl wikipedia article is awful.

2015-03-26 Thread Joel Sing
On Sunday 22 March 2015, Jiří Navrátil wrote: Good morning Bob, I did a quick fix OpenBSD, FreeBSD[2] and many others Where I can get list of supported operating systems, please? I will add them. The current list of platforms supported by LibreSSL portable is available at:

Proposed small change for ping(8)

2015-03-26 Thread Gregory Edigarov
Hello, This makes ping -v really verbose, telling about lost packets as they progress. Index: ping.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ping/ping.8,v retrieving revision 1.52 diff -u -p -u -r1.52 ping.8 --- ping.8 24 Mar 2014

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:46:12PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: * Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com [2015-03-26 14:36]: however I agree that if we do this for ipv6 we should do it for ipv4 as well but then do we care about tons of stuff out there parsing ifconfig output? that's the prime

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Henning Brauer
* Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com [2015-03-26 14:36]: On 26 March 2015 at 14:27, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: seems reasonable. (I'd quite like that for v4 too, though it wouldn't cope with non-contiguous netmask ;) non-contiguous netmasks for IPv4 addresses configured on an

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: How do people feel about printing the prefixlen in CIDR notation? I'm annoyed about outputs not fitting in 80 chars when using autoconf magic: -inet6 fd00::f2de:f1ff:fe6a:15d1 prefixlen 64 autoconf pltime 3594 vltime 7194

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 26/03/15(Thu) 17:46, Henning Brauer wrote: * Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com [2015-03-26 14:36]: On 26 March 2015 at 14:27, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: seems reasonable. (I'd quite like that for v4 too, though it wouldn't cope with non-contiguous netmask ;)

Patch to OpenSSL 014 patch

2015-03-26 Thread Brad
Here's one other small error in another patch file. This patch is here: http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.4/common/014_openssl.patch rbt@teal:~/Downloads$ diff -u 014_openssl.patch 014_openssl.patch.rbt --- 014_openssl.patch 2015-03-26 14:04:15.316496714 -0400 +++

Small patch to 5.4 OpenSSL patch

2015-03-26 Thread Brad
Hey tech, This is a patch for: http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.4/common/016_openssl.patch The closing parenthesis was left off. Thanks, Brad rbt@teal:~/Downloads$ cat openbsd_5.4_016_openssl.patch --- 016_openssl.patch 2015-03-26 13:48:44.776479245 -0400 +++

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 06:50:37PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 26/03/15(Thu) 17:39, Florian Obser wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: How do people feel about printing the prefixlen in CIDR notation? I'm annoyed about outputs not fitting in 80

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 26/03/15(Thu) 17:39, Florian Obser wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: How do people feel about printing the prefixlen in CIDR notation? I'm annoyed about outputs not fitting in 80 chars when using autoconf magic: -inet6 fd00::f2de:f1ff:fe6a:15d1

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 26/03/15(Thu) 17:35, Florian Obser wrote: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:46:12PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: * Mike Belopuhov m...@belopuhov.com [2015-03-26 14:36]: however I agree that if we do this for ipv6 we should do it for ipv4 as well but then do we care about tons of stuff out

tail: -r mem leak with non-regular files

2015-03-26 Thread Tobias Stoeckmann
Hi, tail -r has two memory leaks when handling non-regular files. You can easily see memory usage increasing with commands like $ mknod pipe p $ tail -r pipe pipe pipe /dev/null And then writing a large file into the pipe three times. top shows the memory usage of tail increasing with each

wsdisplay.4: document IOCTLs

2015-03-26 Thread dan mclaughlin
there were a number of common IOCTLs that weren't documented. i read the code pretty thoroughly to make sure everything here is correct. there are some things i don't know, like what 'stride' is. currently it just mentions that it should be 1 for VGA. i read into the rasops code as far as i could,

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: While here can I convert autoconfprivacy to privacy or +privacy? Please don't change this. The name of the option was chosen such that web searches come up with the proper RFC and related references.

Re: ef(4), eg(4), el(4), ex(4) and ie(4)

2015-03-26 Thread Ted Unangst
Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 26/03/15(Thu) 08:00, Ted Unangst wrote: Martin Pieuchot wrote: Even our ISA Ethernet drivers can be converted to if_input(). If you still use some of these, I appreciate test reports. I'm asking here because Miod said everybody can test them... hum hum.

Re: Small ifconfig output tweak for inet6?

2015-03-26 Thread Theo de Raadt
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: While here can I convert autoconfprivacy to privacy or +privacy? Please don't change this. The name of the option was chosen such that web searches come up with the proper RFC and related references. Yes, I agree. The inet6