On 2015/04/15 23:33, Marc Espie wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:15PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
I've seen at least -beta versions short before release locks. Not
sure if there are -alpha too? Those should be treated
same way as snapshots, I think.
This is the exact same
On 16/04/15(Thu) 10:02, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
ping
A bit too soon to ping ;) You could wait at least a week!
On 2015/04/16 12:03, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Am 4/15/2015 um 11:33 PM schrieb Marc Espie:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:15PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
I've seen at least -beta versions short before release locks. Not
sure if there are -alpha too? Those should be treated
same
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:06:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 13/04/15(Mon) 17:49, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
Hi,
Attached below an updated patch that makes the layout a bit more sensible.
It's nice it works.
Now like various students that applied for the GSoC you've done the
On 15/04/15(Wed) 10:46, attila wrote:
Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org writes:
On 14/04/15(Tue) 15:22, attila wrote:
Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org writes:
static const struct usb_devno ualea_devs[] = {
{ USB_VENDOR_ARANEUS, USB_PRODUCT_ARANEUS_ALEA }
};
Is it
Am 4/16/2015 um 12:03 PM schrieb Sebastian Reitenbach:
Am 4/15/2015 um 11:33 PM schrieb Marc Espie:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:15PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
I've seen at least -beta versions short before release locks. Not
sure if there are -alpha too? Those should be treated
ping
Am 4/15/2015 um 11:33 PM schrieb Marc Espie:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:15PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
I've seen at least -beta versions short before release locks. Not
sure if there are -alpha too? Those should be treated
same way as snapshots, I think.
This is the exact same
On 13/04/15(Mon) 17:49, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
Hi,
Attached below an updated patch that makes the layout a bit more sensible.
It's nice it works.
Now like various students that applied for the GSoC you've done the
first step. The interesting part of that GSoC is also the boring part:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:19:39AM BST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2015/04/16 12:03, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Am 4/15/2015 um 11:33 PM schrieb Marc Espie:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:15PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach
wrote:
I've seen at least -beta versions short before release locks.
Well, lets begin.
In the future, I wish to have fd_getfile() returning acquired fp instance.
The goal is to not to have pointer to destroyed fp instance
in FREF()/FRELE()/fd_getfile() races. This one requres modification of
getsock(), getvnode() and dupfdopen() functions, they must receive
This documents the error code when passing multiple cmsg structs. Let me
know if the wording needs to be improved.
Index: lib/libc/sys/send.2
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/send.2,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p -r1.31
Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org writes:
On 15/04/15(Wed) 10:46, attila wrote:
Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org writes:
On 14/04/15(Tue) 15:22, attila wrote:
Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org writes:
static const struct usb_devno ualea_devs[] = {
{ USB_VENDOR_ARANEUS,
Range requests as defined in RFC7233 is required for resuming
interrupted http(s) downloads for example:
ftp -C http://foo.bar/install57.iso
With this diff, httpd parses Range header in the requests and
provide either 206(Partial Content) or 416(Range not Satisfiable)
responses with Content-Range
14 matches
Mail list logo
