On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:16:59AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Now that we "fixed" this historical hack, we have:
>
> rt_ifa->ifa_ifp == rt_ifp
>
> Ok?
OK bluhm@
>
> Index: netinet6/nd6.c
> ===
> RCS file:
Hi,
There's an old bug in ld.so preventing sdl2 to be ported to openbsd.
Lately I had time to play with it and continued the work of Henri
Kemppainen. I think I managed to fix the issue. I tested the patch
with amd64 and i386 builds. Could someone please have a look at it?
It introduces some
Hi!
After halex@ removed a restriction to use passfile for creation of
crypto volume, man page wasn't changed to explain new behaviour.
OK?
Index: bioctl.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/bioctl/bioctl.8,v
retrieving revision 1.97
diff
Hi people,
identd's parent process needs to pledge "id" so it can call setgroups
and friends later.
--
Gregor
Index: identd.c
===
RCS file: /mnt/media/cvs/src/usr.sbin/identd/identd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p
Nice to see rubber duck debugging working. The attached patch seems to
be enough
--
Gregor
--
Index: smtpd.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.250
diff -u -p -u -r1.250 smtpd.c
---
On Thu, October 22, 2015 00:16, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:19:12PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
>> Hi!
>> After halex@ removed a restriction to use passfile for creation of
>> crypto volume, man page wasn't changed to explain new behaviour.
>> OK?
>>
>
> why not just remove
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:19:12PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> Hi!
> After halex@ removed a restriction to use passfile for creation of
> crypto volume, man page wasn't changed to explain new behaviour.
> OK?
>
why not just remove the sentence? if you really want to keep it, i
suggest using
Hi people,
I've noticed smtpd's deliver_maildir getting killed on syscall 15
(chmod) with the latest snapshot. I've rebuilt and core dumped it as
described by Sebastien and this is the backtrace I got:
#0 0x1d7e8175149a in chmod () at :2
#1 0x1d7c72744ffe in mkdirs (path=0x7f7dd0d0
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:35:53AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> On Thu, October 22, 2015 00:16, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:19:12PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> After halex@ removed a restriction to use passfile for creation of
> >> crypto volume, man page
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:15:08AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> dstifp is never used.
>
> ok?
OK bluhm@
>
> Index: netinet6/frag6.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet6/frag6.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.64
> diff -u -p
>Does it make sense to reference the syscall numbers in pledge(2)?
No not really. By 5.9 release the kernel printf's will go away,
and people won't get such alerts. Maybe they will get kernel log's,
but I will consider generating them with system call names.
Hi Sebastien,
Sorry, I totally overlooked signal(3) and that it would call die(), and
also just tried to play several times but since I never tried to escape
it via ctrl+c, not exposing the problem, I removed tty. My bad... I
will try harder next time if I ever (hopefully) send further
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Sorry, I totally overlooked signal(3) and that it would call die(), and also
> just tried to play several times but since I never tried to escape it via
> ctrl+c, not exposing the problem, I removed tty. My
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:04:51PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> Let's give some pledge(2) love to hangman(6)!
>
> It seems to work fine for me with the patch mentioned below, nevertheless
> please be aware that I don't consider myself a developer, just a mere
> OpenBSD user with 'security uncle
Does it make sense to reference the syscall numbers in pledge(2)?
Jan
--- /usr/src/lib/libc/sys/pledge.2 Thu Oct 15 00:39:04 2015
+++ ./pledge.2 Wed Oct 21 09:41:26 2015
@@ -468,6 +468,9 @@ All other paths will return
.Er ENOENT .
.Sh RETURN VALUES
.Rv -std
+.Sh FILES
+.Pa
Hi Doug,
Thank you for taking your time into this!
I followed your advise and changed malloc to stdio but also tweaked a
few lines later. After initscr() [setting up the screen/tty] and setup()
[open the dictionary file/rpath] we can drop priviliges only to stdio
and hangman(6) will live
Now that (rt_ifa->ifa_ifp == rt_ifp) we can simplify the check below.
Ok?
Index: net/route.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v
retrieving revision 1.253
diff -u -p -r1.253 route.c
--- net/route.c 16 Oct 2015 12:36:02 -
17 matches
Mail list logo