Ryan Freeman:
> However, for some reason after sometimes mere hours -- othertimes days at a
> time, the gem0 interface needs to be cycled: [...] starting to wonder
> if this machine is at its EOL and the network ports are dying :(
I see the same problem with the gem in my Blade 150.
--
Hi!
Simple pledge around nohup, it starts with "stdio rpath wpath cpath
exec" and then after nohup.out file is open(2)'ed it can drop to "stdio
exec" only:
Index: nohup.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/nohup/nohup.c,v
retrieving
Hello,
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:19:48PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > The idea has been proposed by Claudio at Varazdin.
>
> I guess the idea is to eliminate the workq. Or is ther naother
> reason to change it?
the primary goal is to kill work queues.
>
> Comments inline
>
thank
Use the *at system calls instead of changing directories.
- todd
Index: usr.bin/at/at.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/at/at.c,v
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -p -u -r1.70 at.c
--- usr.bin/at/at.c 9 Nov 2015 15:57:39 -
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:18:22PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 02:37:58AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > + for (i = 0; (i < size) && (rv == 0); i++) {
> >
> > rv is unitialized in the first interation
> >
> > > + io.pfrio_buffer = addr++;
> > > +
> On 09.11.2015, at 22:21, Alexandr Nedvedicky
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:18:22PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 02:37:58AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
+ for (i = 0; (i < size) && (rv == 0); i++) {
>>>
>>> rv is
Index: main.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/less/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -p -r1.26 main.c
--- main.c 9 Nov 2015 18:41:46 - 1.26
+++ main.c 9 Nov 2015 21:09:46 -
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
* Entry
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Todd C. Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:52:53 -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>> If fdopendir() fails, dfd needs to be closed.
>
> Since perr() exits like err() does we don't need to close dfd.
Ah, in that case, ok guenther@
Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> In dc(1) the function array_free() knows how to skip a null pointer so
> calling code doesn't need to avoid passing null.
> Also, minor style (braces) clean-up.
ok mmcc@
It may also be a good idea to change the allocation names in the form
bmalloc
Hi,
This reduces tsec(4) TX interrupts by over a factor of four per interface,
boosting throughput by a couple of percent for
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=4096 | nc ${host} ${port}
It does this by reducing TX interrupts notifications to one per frame, from
one per mbuf fragment, and by
Hi,
schwarze@isnote $ cat rs.c | rs -H
61 line 1
[...]
25 line 50
26 line 12338
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
rs(1) -H always segfaults for input larger than 4 KB.
The reason is that, in get_line(),
* Initially, (irows == 0), curline gets set to the static buffer ibuf.
* -H
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 02:11:06PM +0100, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing around with client-side certificates[1] and saw that the
> manpage of tls_init.3 recommend to uses the functions:
> tls_config_set_ca_{file,path,mem} only in client context.
>
> But to check client-side
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe
> > to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big
> > step in this direction and I'd
Perhaps it should go in FAQ section 7, or somewhere else, I don't know
where. Note pccon is only for some platforms.
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:50:12AM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:23:08AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:01:52PM +,
Brian Conway [bcon...@rcesoftware.com] wrote:
> I meant positioning the whole case bottom-up (i.e. but the hot surface
> at the top).
Oh I see!
I just got a beta unit. I was late to the party. I used some of this
ZM-STG1 thermal grease (comes with a paint applicator type brush) and
the
Ping?
On 27/10/2015 12:33, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
Hi!
I have been running this on my "production" server, for a few days
now, without any apparent issues (I also tested manual interactions
adding/removing SPAMTRAP and TRAPPED entries).
Any comments? :)
Best regards,
Ricardo Mestre
On
Hi,
Here is a typo in the verbose mode of restore:
Index: tape.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/restore/tape.c,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -p -r1.46 tape.c
--- tape.c 25 Aug 2015 04:18:43 - 1.46
+++ tape.c 9
Manuel Giraud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a typo in the verbose mode of restore:
ok mmcc@
> Index: tape.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/restore/tape.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.46
> diff -u -p -r1.46 tape.c
> --- tape.c25 Aug
On 11/09/15 11:50, Tati Chevron wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:23:08AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:01:52PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why the OpenBSD installer still defaults to a
>>> terminal type of vt-220 for the VGA framebuffer
I meant positioning the whole case bottom-up (i.e. but the hot surface
at the top).
Brian Conway
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Brian Conway [bcon...@rcesoftware.com] wrote:
>>
>> Taking into account Mr. Cappuccio's advice on using thermal paste
>>
Brian Conway [bcon...@rcesoftware.com] wrote:
>
> Taking into account Mr. Cappuccio's advice on using thermal paste
> between the CPU and heat spreader, and also positioning it bottom-up,
> this one stabilized at 51 C at idle. I haven't had a chance to do much
> benchmarking for higher temps yet,
On Mon 2015.11.09 at 00:14 +0100, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Dear daemonfishes,
>
> After using evilwm for a decade, I'm quite impressed with cwm's
> codebase and functionality. (I just couldn't understand one
> feature: what's the use of ptrmove* if you cannot click? (...Mr.
> Andersen?))
I've
There is a remotely triggerable panic in the wireless subsystem
involving WPA (a.k.a RSN).
RSN element parsing in the input path lacks validation of the group
cipher and group management cipher values. If a bad value is received
it is stored without validation, which will trigger a panic when the
Hello,
>
> For now the code gets more as we have two ways to iterate over the
> tree. When you remove the additional work queues I expect many -
> diffs. So if this code dupliation is temporary, this aproach is
> fine for me.
yes code duplication is temporary, I'd like to kill work queues.
>
Hi tech@,
I tried the code from radioctl(1) on a test program, since I don't have
a radio tuner, and cannot reproduce this problem, nevertheless like
Douglas mentioned below shouldn't strtod(3) be used instead of atof(3)
since it has overflow/underflow checks for free?
Also are there any
Hi tech@,
In dc(1) the function array_free() knows how to skip a null pointer
so calling code doesn't need to avoid passing null.
Also, minor style (braces) clean-up.
- Michael
Index: bcode.c
===
RCS file:
> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:57:24 +0100
> From: Christian Weisgerber
>
> I would like to sync the system time periodically back to the RTC.
>
> Currently we update the RTC
> (1) when the time is set with clock_settime() or settimeofday(), which
> never happens for a
>
> I'm wondering - how does it affect tools that load several thousands of IPs
> into a table? Like spamd, bgpd (for spam lists etc.), or pfctl for IP black
> lists (as distributed by ET).
>
> There are valid use cases with HUGE tables, but I have to admit that I didn't
> test your diff yet.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Todd C. Miller
wrote:
> Use the *at system calls instead of changing directories.
...
> + if ((dfd = open(AT_SPOOL, O_RDONLY|O_DIRECTORY)) == -1 ||
> + (spool = fdopendir(dfd)) == NULL)
> perr2("Cannot open
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:52:53 -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> If fdopendir() fails, dfd needs to be closed.
Since perr() exits like err() does we don't need to close dfd.
- todd
> On November 9, 2015 at 5:04 AM Michael McConville wrote:
> Tobias, could you split your latest diff into separate diffs for each
> function type (xmalloc, xcalloc, etc.)? It'd make it easier to zero in
> on the problematic hunks and fast-track the rest.
I don't really see
On 9 November 2015 at 01:27, Kevin Reay wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> Do you have a library of pcaps available somewhere?
>
> Just a small local set that I've built up for testing.
>
> Is there interest in
Hello Guillermo,
On 08/11/15(Sun) 17:06, Guillermo Bernaldo de Quiros Maraver wrote:
> Hi, good afternoon.
>
> I don't know if this is the correct list to post the next email so, I'm
> sorry if this isn't the correct place.
>
> My laptop computer wich is an MSI GE70 2QE has a network interface
Quoth Okan Demirmen on Mon, Nov 09, 2015:
> On Mon 2015.11.09 at 00:14 +0100, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> > Dear daemonfishes,
> >
> > After using evilwm for a decade, I'm quite impressed with cwm's
> > codebase and functionality. (I just couldn't understand one
> > feature: what's the use of
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:23:08AM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:01:52PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
Is there any reason why the OpenBSD installer still defaults to a
terminal type of vt-220 for the VGA framebuffer console, and doesn't
even suggest pccon as an
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:01:52PM +, Tati Chevron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:18:55PM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >I think it should be Shift-F1 etc, but since this is a general problem
> >with the xterm entry not just on OpenBSD, I suggest you discuss it with
ok nicm
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 11:42:27PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Here, I:
>
> 1) remove a useless comment
> 2) remove a needless void* cast
> 3) remove a bunch of NULL-checks for free()
> 4) simplify a little associated logic
>
> Call me a one trick pony.
>
> ok?
>
>
>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:43:10PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Maybe we should pick this off in smaller chunks so that we don't get
> immobilized by a few scattered issues.
>
> ok for removing xfree from aucat?
>
yes, ok ratchov; if later this causes me merges i'll find another
solution.
ping
On 11/04/15 23:29, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Hello tech@,
I got somewhat annoyed by the fact that OpenBSD's tail can't follow
multiple files and since the last attempt at it was from 2008 I thought
I'd give it a shot. I already sent an earlier version of this diff to
Landry who called it
39 matches
Mail list logo