So I just wrapped my head around vfs(9) with regard to making ktrace
following symlinks again, however I don't quite understand what problems
may occur when doing so. May anyone enlighten me on this?
This feature was explicitly disabled 17 years ago[1] appearently because
FreeBSD did so[2] but I
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 01:15, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch for using alternative control socket for relayd and relayctl.
> It's based on ospfd. I would like for this to get in order to be able to
> control multiple relayd daemons on
Hello tech@,
Attached a patch to remove the binc function from vi and replace it with
recallocarray. The functions effectively do the same thing since
BINC_{GOTO,RET} already do the nlen > llen comparison. I've run
this without any issues, but since recallocarray does extra checks and
binc ALWAYS
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 05:11:31PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> >> Drop the conditional shrt macro definitions and use short everywhere.
> >
> > Why not use uint8_t then?
>
> Isn't the point of the code to *not* use an unsigned type?
Yes, those changes [1] were commited with the following
Hi,
Here is a patch for using alternative control socket for relayd and relayctl.
It's based on ospfd. I would like for this to get in order to be able to
control multiple relayd daemons on different rdomains.
regards,
Giannis
Index: relayd.8
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:11:57PM +0930, Jack Burton wrote:
> Just noticed this in passing & thought I'd mention it.
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
> Index: starttls.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/starttls.8,v
> retrieving
Just noticed this in passing & thought I'd mention it.
Index: starttls.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/starttls.8,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.22 starttls.8
--- starttls.8 24 Dec 2015 16:54:37 - 1.22
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:40:10PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Anthony J. Bentley wrote on Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:21:55AM -0600:
>
> > ok?
>
> NO, definitely NOT OK without a thorough rationale.
>
i imagine the rationale is the existence of -p1003.1-2013 ;)
> We do not add
Hi Anthony,
Anthony J. Bentley wrote on Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:21:55AM -0600:
> ok?
NO, definitely NOT OK without a thorough rationale.
We do not add definitions just like that. The file st.in
has lots of irrelevant definitions already, and i won't let
that trend continue.
If i remember
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:21:55AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> ok?
>
morning. yes, ok.
jmc
> Index: share/man/man7/mdoc.7
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/mdoc.7,v
> retrieving revision 1.153
> diff -u -p -r1.153
ok?
Index: share/man/man7/mdoc.7
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/mdoc.7,v
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -p -r1.153 mdoc.7
--- share/man/man7/mdoc.7 10 Jun 2017 16:32:08 - 1.153
+++ share/man/man7/mdoc.7
11 matches
Mail list logo