avoid scan_dmesg in armv7 md_installboot

If there is whitespace in the pattern sed returns scan_dmesg will sort all of the words. As hw.product is available on ramdisks use that instead to avoid the problem. Index: install.md === RCS file:

Synaptics touchpads: coordinate limits

This patch adds a query for the lower coordinate limits to the Synaptics part of pms. Up to now, the driver always uses the "typical bezel limits" as given in the "Synaptics PS/2 Interfacing Guide". These limits are indeed typical and often work well, but they aren't exact and you cannot control

Re: ospfd: add IMSG_IFADDRADD to deal with "sh /etc/netstart if"

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:59:46PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 06:24:06PM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 02:45:03PM +0200, Florian Riehm wrote: > > > On 06/25/17 23:47, Remi Locherer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > ospfd does not react nicely

Re: Update inaccurate comment in rasops(9)

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:31:00PM +0200, Frederic Cambus wrote: > Update inaccurate comment: rasops_copycols() doesn't use bcopy() > anymore, but either memmove() or slow_bcopy(). > > Comments? OK? Ping. Anyone? > Index: sys/dev/rasops/rasops.c >

Re: Please test: HZ bump

I've been testing the second version of this diff in a number of areas (servers, desktop, laptop, routers) and I haven't noticed anything interesting with power usage, run time on the laptops nor anything else, anywhere. That's probably a good thing...

Blocking mem alloc & sosetopt()

In order to stop allocating multiple mbufs and possibly waiting with the socket lock held in NFS, I'd like sosetopt() to no longer free the mbuf it receives. This diff makes sosetopt() similar to sogetopt(), the caller is responsible for allocating & freeing the option mbuf. ok? Index:

Re: RETGUARD

Edd Barrett: > > lang/pypy retguard > > I'm looking into PyPy. > > Can you provide the build output? Oops, sorry, I forgot to save the logs before I cleaned the machines yesterday. Should be straightforward to reproduce, though. At some point the build dies with a segfault.

Re: Blocking memory allocation & solock()

> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:35:30 +0200 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > On 21/08/17(Mon) 15:33, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > I'd like to reduce the number of blocking memory allocations holding > > the NET_LOCK(). > > > > Diff below moves m_get(M_WAIT) before grabbing the socket

Re: Blocking memory allocation & solock()

On 21/08/17(Mon) 15:33, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I'd like to reduce the number of blocking memory allocations holding > the NET_LOCK(). > > Diff below moves m_get(M_WAIT) before grabbing the socket lock for > sogetopt(). Diff below includes the prototype change. ok? Index: kern/uipc_socket.c

Blocking memory allocation & solock()

I'd like to reduce the number of blocking memory allocations holding the NET_LOCK(). Diff below moves m_get(M_WAIT) before grabbing the socket lock for sogetopt(). ok? Index: kern/uipc_socket.c === RCS file:

Re: twm.1: xdm -> xenodm

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:11:34PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Feedback? twm is an upstream man page. I prefer not to touch it. You can submit a patch upstream (xorg-de...@lists.freedesktop.org) to replace xdm by 'display manager' as there are a lots of them nowadays (gdm, kdm, lightdm, xdm,

Re: RETGUARD

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:13:05PM -, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > lang/pypy retguard I'm looking into PyPy. Can you provide the build output? Cheers -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk

Re: RETGUARD

On 2017-08-19, Theo de Raadt wrote: > We are at the point where userland and base are fully working without > regressions, and the remaining impacts are in a few larger ports which > directly access the return address (for a variety of reasons). Fallout from building amd64

twm.1: xdm -> xenodm

Feedback? Index: man/twm.man === RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/twm/man/twm.man,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 twm.man --- man/twm.man 10 May 2015 09:57:50 - 1.5 +++ man/twm.man 21 Aug 2017 10:10:05 - @@ -51,7

Re: Document the RI_ROTATE_CCW flag in rasops.9

> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:48:33 +0200 > From: Frederic Cambus > > Hi tech@, > > Document the newly introduced RI_ROTATE_CCW flag. > > Comments? OK? Thanks! ok kettenis@ > Index: share/man/man9/rasops.9 > ===

Document the RI_ROTATE_CCW flag in rasops.9

Hi tech@, Document the newly introduced RI_ROTATE_CCW flag. Comments? OK? Index: share/man/man9/rasops.9 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/rasops.9,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.17 rasops.9 ---

make: setenv or esetenv

Hi, In make(1), setenv() was mostly called through a wrapper function esetenv() which exits on error. When setting MAKEBASEDIRECTORY the return value of setenv() was not checked. Converting the call to esetenv() makes it more consistent. The third param of setenv(), overwrite, doesn't matter