> On Sep 10, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
>
> Patch was also posted here, but I didn't test it.
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=149784342025304=2
omg we're twins
Hi tech@
Remove unnecessary assignment. Thanks!
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
Index: pctr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/pctr/pctr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -p -r1.23 pctr.c
--- pctr.c 10 Sep 2017 11:30:43 - 1.23
Hi,
Patch was also posted here, but I didn't test it.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=149784342025304=2
- Michael
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:23:49PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Saw this when preparing the monotonic clock patch.
>
> This is a leak, right? Every other return path
Hi,
Saw this when preparing the monotonic clock patch.
This is a leak, right? Every other return path in read_track()
aside from the malloc failure frees sec.
I think the function itself is more confusing than it needs to be
and could use a refactor but that belongs in a separate patch.
Hi,
This keeps the progress printouts from stalling in the
pathological case.
We were also missing for gettimeofday(2).
--
Scott Cheloha
Index: usr.bin/cdio/mmc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/cdio/mmc.c,v
retrieving revision
Hi,
Use a monotonic clock for the elapsed time trial.
--
Scott Cheloha
Index: bin/md5/md5.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/md5/md5.c,v
retrieving revision 1.91
diff -u -p -r1.91 md5.c
--- bin/md5/md5.c 22 May 2017 16:00:47 -
Hi Raf,
Raf Czlonka wrote on Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:03:03PM +0100:
> I guess the two could be simplified further and combined into one
Done, and i also fixed various other aspects while there.
Yours,
Ingo