Re: Revisit tcpdump(8) pledge(2) promises

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:40:31AM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:53:09PM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:58:28PM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > > > > > > 'rpath dns' for DNS lookups > > > > > > > To clarify, "rpath" is not needed for DNS lookups,

Re: armv7 a4x dsb fix

On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 07:56:30AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 06:14:06AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > just the bug fix, so this diff leaves the unused relics around and so, > > but better than current/nothing, and hopefully small enough to get looked > > at.

Re: armv7 a few tc_counter_mask fixes

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:41:56PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote: > > > Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would someone explain to me > > > the value of this MSB robbing? > > > >

Re: [Patch] directory.3 should describe return value of readdir_r()

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:52:58 +1000, Ross L Richardson wrote: > directory.3 (has no "RETURN VALUES" section and) fails to > describe the return value of readdir_r(). > > The diff below adds a sentence about the return value. > It also converts "return (X)" to "return X" in the > sample code.

HEADS-UP: package @version

The switch to clang for some arches was a bit annoying, because suddenly you had to force an update of every package (practically, bumping every package was next to impossible). The HEADS-UP is that actually there should be *no* heads-up for 6.2. Thanks to sthen@'s prodding, I've just committed a

syslogd log startup errors persistently

Hi, When syslogd writes some startup errors to stderr or console, they never appear in any log file. After initialization, write a summary into log files and to remote log host. So the problem shows up, when someone is looking at the persistent messages. syslogd[91295]: dropped 3 messages

Re: unbound 1.6.6

I'm running this now and haven't noticed any issues so far. - todd

Re: armv7 a few tc_counter_mask fixes

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote: > > Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would someone explain to me > > the value of this MSB robbing? > > I think, if you're proposing a change, you should explain why that >

Re: armv7 a few tc_counter_mask fixes

On 2017/09/18 04:28, Artturi Alm wrote: > Do i really need to reference datasheets, or would someone explain to me > the value of this MSB robbing? I think, if you're proposing a change, you should explain why that change should be made, rather than asking others to defend the current situation..