Moving bugs@ and Matthieu to BCC, addings tech@.
Since no one else has fixed this yet, I did. This bug is a combination
or two things. 1.) When a wsmouse goes away on a KVM, it becomes
detached, but not disconnected, and 2.) some mice still have things to
be read (or think they do) when they're
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Yeah, fully understandable. I'll bump this once 6.2 is out.
>
> I'll apply the changes Philip suggested (thanks!) and then build a
> release to verify that everything works.
>
>
Woups, seems like I managed to break ftp(1) in the
On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 09:32 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 04:35:39PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
>
> > A linear search works well for the current small quarantine (16) but
> > won't work
> > well if you ever want to have a larger / configurable quarantine
> > size. It would
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:05:34PM +, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:28:57AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Malloc maintains a list if 16 slots of chunks to be freed. On free a
> > > chunk is put in a random slot and the existing
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:28:57AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Malloc maintains a list if 16 slots of chunks to be freed. On free a
> > chunk is put in a random slot and the existing chunk in that slot is
> > actually freed. Currently, the code only checks
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:16:54AM +0200, Gellert Farkas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not quite sure of the process or exact protocol, but would it be
> possible for those responsible for ACPI related bugs have a look at my
> previous post? https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=150607863024523
>
> I don't
Hello Lads,
I have submitted a proposed patch for hostname.if5 to show a user how
to do Point to Point Addressing on an interface (thanks to @Tedu for
publishing the correct syntax which helped me.
So I (tried to ) show syntax for that case on the hostname.if manual file
Thanks to Nikolai
Alexander Bluhm(alexander.bl...@gmx.net) on 2017.09.22 19:54:56 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> The relayd regression tests for chunked http traffic fail sometimes.
> Ktrace reveals that this happens when the \r and \n at the end of
> a header line are read in separate chunks. Then evbuffer_readline()
>
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:12:32AM BST, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > This is unrelated to your diff but what I do instead is to check
> > the BUILDINFO file - it's tiny and all the information you need,
> > is already there.
>
> While we're on the subject, I'll point out that
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Malloc maintains a list if 16 slots of chunks to be freed. On free a
> chunk is put in a random slot and the existing chunk in that slot is
> actually freed. Currently, the code only checks the slot selected for
> a double free.
>
> This diff adds code to check all
Yeah, the SHA256.sig should be enough and just veify that everything is
correct. If not, fetch the incorrect sets again. I just wanted to give
a brief explaination on how I noticed this inconsistency. But yeah,
thanks for pointing me to a better solution.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:12:32AM
Hi,
I'm not quite sure of the process or exact protocol, but would it be
possible for those responsible for ACPI related bugs have a look at my
previous post? https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=150607863024523
I don't want to be pushy and I am in no rush for a fix, I just want to
ensure that
Raf Czlonka wrote:
> This is unrelated to your diff but what I do instead is to check
> the BUILDINFO file - it's tiny and all the information you need,
> is already there.
While we're on the subject, I'll point out that sometimes only the base sets
change, but not the x sets. If you download
Yeah, fully understandable. I'll bump this once 6.2 is out.
I'll apply the changes Philip suggested (thanks!) and then build a
release to verify that everything works.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:35:03PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I like this, but it's rather late in the release cycle to
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 04:35:39PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> A linear search works well for the current small quarantine (16) but won't
> work
> well if you ever want to have a larger / configurable quarantine size. It
> would
> also be nice to make this fast enough to enable by default.
>
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:56:51PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:01:57PM BST, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My morning routine consists of downloading the latest snapshot files and
> > running the upgrade. To avoid wasting bandwidth and time, I check the
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo