On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 06:01:00PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If a machine is configured in vm.conf to have the owner of a regular
> user, the ownership of the machine is lost upon reboot and root becomes
> the new owner. When restarting the machine, the tty is kept open and
> the
Hi,
> See my updated diff for reusing the gopi struct, please.
ok, but the diff seems to be against wrong revision. You seems to
have other diffs, moving gop and gopi to global at least.
Can you send it entirely?
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 02:09:29 +0200
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:15:20AM +, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:15:33 -0500
> Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> > I tested this diff in combination with your "Implement machine gop command"
> > diff on a Dell PowerEdge R230 and a VirtualBox VM (EFI
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 11:15:33PM +, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> I tested this diff in combination with your "Implement machine gop command"
> diff on a Dell PowerEdge R230 and a VirtualBox VM (EFI enabled). No
> regressions, however 'machine gop' doesn't work quite how I expected it to
> --
Updated diff below now that the first bits got committed.
gopi can be used safely instead of an extra info struct, so munge it.
Declaring the gop and gopi strucutures globally makes things easier in
preparation for the next commit.
Both changes also improve consistency with regard to other
On 2017/10/06 13:51, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> > workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> > think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
> > processes.
> >
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> > workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> > think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
> > processes.
> >
> > It seems that perhaps threads are
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
> workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
> think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
> processes.
>
> It seems that perhaps threads are counted
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:12:01PM +, Jan Stary wrote:
> Isn't "4 * a(1)" a more natural incarnation of pi than "2 * a(2^1)"?
That's indeed the most simple formula with regard to (inverse)
trigonometric functions.
I have been bumping into maxproc limits a lot recently on my
workstation. While I do have quite a lot of processes at times, I don't
think I have quite been tripping into the limits of number of actual
processes.
It seems that perhaps threads are counted towards these. Is that
expected/desirable?
Christian Weisgerber:
> Admittedly, this is cosmetic:
> Use the modern POSIX idiom "-exec ... {} +" instead of find|xargs.
tb@ kindly pointed out to me that Klemens Nanni submitted a better
patch for this four months ago; "-exec +" allows us to combine the
two find invocations into one:
For what it's worth, POSIX has
-l
(The letter ell.) Define the math functions and initialize scale
to 20, instead of the default zero; see the EXTENDED DESCRIPTION
section.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2016edition/utilities/bc.html
Cheers,
On Fri,
Hi,
An experimental change to use TSC as a timecounter source on a variety
of modern Intel and AMD CPUs has been just committed and enabled on
OpenBSD/amd64 thanks to the work done by Adam Steen.
The rationale is, quoting the commit message:
If frequency of an invariant (non-stop) time stamp
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 08:08:32PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Admittedly, this is cosmetic:
> Use the modern POSIX idiom "-exec ... {} +" instead of find|xargs.
> ok?
>
> Index: include/Makefile
> ===
> RCS file:
Currently, the bc(1) manpage describes "-l" as
Allow specification of an arbitrary precision math library
I am not a native speaker, but "specification of a library"
seems unclear here. It loads /usr/share/misc/bc.library,
not that the user could "specify" some other library to load.
Isn't "4 * a(1)" a more natural incarnation of pi than "2 * a(2^1)"?
Jan
Index: bc.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/bc/bc.1,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p -r1.32 bc.1
--- bc.117 Nov 2015 05:45:35 -
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:23:58PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Bumping this, as I assume it wasn't prioritized during the beta.
>
We were locked. I'm working backward through emails, should get to this
in the next day or so.
-ml
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 06:01:00PM +0200,
17 matches
Mail list logo