Hello,
makefs has an xmalloc.c with emalloc() function, but one thing
was still using malloc() directly. This patch makes malloc()
always happen through emalloc().
- Michael
Index: msdos/mkfs_msdos.c
===
RCS file:
Hi,
Use the actual ioctl request macros instead of relying on compatibility
indirection.
Looks like wsconscfg(8) is the last consumer of the compat macros
defined in dev/wscons/wsconsio.h. Assuming there's no usage in ports,
now might be the time to zap them?
Comments? OK?
Index: wsconscfg.c
reads fine, and works for me in light testing.
OK phessler@
On 2017 Oct 30 (Mon) at 08:36:34 +0100 (+0100), Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
:Hello,
:
:patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
:parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to
IIRC dc was removed and then added back.
ok nicm
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:44:28PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in 2015 remote(5) was trimmed down when tip was removed. It looks like
> documentation for capability "dc" was also removed by accident. cu(1) still
> supports this
On 31/10/17(Tue) 06:56, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
>
> Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
> line 1843. I assume the ip6_send() is prone to same error.
>
> I'll try to figure
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:29:10AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 31/10/17(Tue) 06:56, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
> >
> > Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
> >
Hello,
just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
line 1843. I assume the ip6_send() is prone to same error.
I'll try to figure out what's going on and send updated diff shortly.
Big thanks to