> Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 17:56:52 -0400
> From: Patrick Wildt
>
> Hi,
>
> claudio@ has a Kaby Lake that exceeds the 128 kB limit, being as big as
> 190 kB. So, for him the ucode isn't being loaded.
>
> On EFI systems we can simply ask EFI to allocate some memory for us.
> I'm not sure why
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 05:56:52PM -0400, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> claudio@ has a Kaby Lake that exceeds the 128 kB limit, being as big as
> 190 kB. So, for him the ucode isn't being loaded.
>
> On EFI systems we can simply ask EFI to allocate some memory for us.
> I'm not sure why this
Hi,
claudio@ has a Kaby Lake that exceeds the 128 kB limit, being as big as
190 kB. So, for him the ucode isn't being loaded.
On EFI systems we can simply ask EFI to allocate some memory for us.
I'm not sure why this file is duplicated 4 times, but it looks like
for efiboot this one is
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:05:32AM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>
> This diff survived multiple tens of kernel builds, a bsd.sp build,
> bsd.rd build, a bsd.mp without these changes, userland/xenocara, a
> make regress a few days ago all on 3 desktops on amd64. Ran under
> all possible scenarios
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:13 PM Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/05/16 23:37, Rachel Roch wrote:
> > > RFC3513 says this:
> > >
> > > o An anycast address must not be used as the source address of
> > > an IPv6 packet.
> > >
> > > o An anycast address must not be assigned to an IPv6 host,
To chime in here, how I have always implemented Anycast DNS
is by creating additional Loopback adapters in the OS, and then
using BGP or OSPF to distribute said Loopback IPs into a routing
table.
Each DNS server participating in Anycast would have the same
IPv4 and IPv6 address configured on that
Hi,
Since updating my snapshot machine last night, I'm seeing the folloing.
This is with one external monitor attached through the dock
(DisplayPort). The "timed out" lines appear when X starts and halt it
for a few minutes. Once X does come up, the error no longer appears. The
last line ("FIFO
On Thu, 16 May 2019 15:15:24 -0300
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 16/05/19(Thu) 00:08, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Regarding the choice of deriving quantum from the priority, are you sure
> > > the priorities are correct? Should we keep priorities? Or if userland
> > > needs priorities
On 2019/05/16 23:37, Rachel Roch wrote:
>
>
> > RFC3513 says this:
> >
> > o An anycast address must not be used as the source address of
> > an IPv6 packet.
> >
> > o An anycast address must not be assigned to an IPv6 host, that
> > is, it may be assigned to an IPv6 router only.
> >
> > And
Hello Klemens,
I think what you see is actually somewhat desired/expected behavior of
current PF. stay tuned for explanation further below.
>
> Clean up:
>
> # ./obj/pfctl -Fa -aregress/*
> 0 tables deleted.
> rules cleared
> 0 tables deleted.
> rules cleared
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
