On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:32:56 +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
said:
> > Before:
> > $ HISTSIZE=10 /bin/sh
> > /bin/sh: internal error: unable to allocate memory
> > <--- no ksh
> Could you provide more details please? A fatal error and a crash are
> very different problems.
So here is another attempt to use information from ACPI to decide what
parts of the address space are usable for PCI devices. This version
attaches the PCI busses late such that the various hacks for VMs to
prevent multiple disk drivers to attach to the same disk still work.
Please test,
Hi,
the X drivers for ATI and AMD video cards are updated and released
simultanemously, given that they share a lot of code.
The patch below updates the 2 drivers to versions 19.1.0 which where
recently released by X.Org.
Apply to /usr/xenocara (or $XSRCDIR) using 'patch -p0 -E' and rebuild
On Fri, Oct 18 2019, tho...@habets.se wrote:
> This can be hard to debug, and could indeed prevent debugging, since
> it can take out the ability to run /bin/sh, depending on how you've
> set up your environment.
>
> Before:
> $ HISTSIZE=10 /bin/sh
> /bin/sh: internal error: unable to
Hello tech@,
Find a patch fixing some details in ssh-keygen.1 regarding the new -Y
flag for signing and verifying signatures.
Precisely:
- Include a missing 'returning a zero exit status' in `-Y verify`
paragraph.
- Don't include `option` in `.Fl I` in ALLOWED SIGNERS section.
-Lucas
Index:
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19 2019, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 19 2019, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >> > bgpd supports up to 255 byte shutdown communications. So the manpage is
> >> > not telling the truth. Also I don't think
On Sat, Oct 19 2019, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 19 2019, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> > bgpd supports up to 255 byte shutdown communications. So the manpage is
>> > not telling the truth. Also I don't think it is helpful to mention the
>> > limit at
I also think a truncated message is way more useful than a replacement
which throws away the content of the message!
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19 2019, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > bgpd supports up to 255 byte shutdown communications. So the manpage is
> > not telling the
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:38:07PM +, Chris Waddey wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> I know this isn't necessary for quite a while, but in anticipation of
> OpenBSD 10.0, I suggest the following diff to sysupgrade.sh:
Thanks. There were two more copies of this code in the tree which
ajacoutot and I
On Sat, Oct 19 2019, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> bgpd supports up to 255 byte shutdown communications. So the manpage is
> not telling the truth. Also I don't think it is helpful to mention the
> limit at all. bgpctl will exit with 'shutdown reason too long' if the text
> is too long which is good
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> As soon as a transfer with an error condition is passed to
> usb_transfer_complete(), usbd_start_next() won't be called.
>
> If the callback of that transfer had already enqueue a new xfer, via
> usbd_transfer(), it will stay on
bgpd supports up to 255 byte shutdown communications. So the manpage is
not telling the truth. Also I don't think it is helpful to mention the
limit at all. bgpctl will exit with 'shutdown reason too long' if the text
is too long which is good enough. For best interop people should keep the
12 matches
Mail list logo