Re: ldomctl, ldomd: Honour DEBUG in Makefile

2019-11-19 Thread Theo de Raadt
Seems accidentally left over from development. As a rule we don't ship with -g. Klemens Nanni wrote: > As of now, `export DEBUG=... ; make' will ignore my flags. > > I guess kettenis wanted symbols by default, so leave a default DEBUG > value that allows overwriting instead of omitting DEBUG

Re: sdhc(4): no 0V one some Intel

2019-11-19 Thread Kevin Lo
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:44:54AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, Hi Patrick, > on some GPD Pocket mlarkin@ has the eMMC doesn't come up. One issue > is that we shouldn't go to 0V on some/most(?) Intel controllers. This > only adds it for his machine, but I know that the Appollo Lake

ldomctl, ldomd: Honour DEBUG in Makefile

2019-11-19 Thread Klemens Nanni
As of now, `export DEBUG=... ; make' will ignore my flags. I guess kettenis wanted symbols by default, so leave a default DEBUG value that allows overwriting instead of omitting DEBUG as usual. OK? Index: ldomctl/Makefile === RCS

Re: unwind: log missing config file

2019-11-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/11/19 20:48, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I > > > can implement the dash semantic, but

Re: unwind: log missing config file

2019-11-19 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I > > can implement the dash semantic, but that's another diff. > Hm, that makes the default setup

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Theo de Raadt
Craig Skinner wrote: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:42:32 + Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/11/07 11:15, Craig Skinner wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:41:07 +0100 Renaud Allard wrote: > > > > Given the amount of people which encrypt /home directory on their > > > > servers, it might be

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Raimo Niskanen
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:00:33AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/11/18 14:45, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:23:27PM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11/18/19 10:08 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > > > > > > > A configuration parameter could be

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Renaud Allard
On 11/19/19 11:11 AM, Craig Skinner wrote: If the installer created a 750Mb /var/cache/ partition, and sysupgrade's cache directory is hard coded as /var/cache/sysupgrade/, would that simply solve the various problems people are having & scripting difficulties? Other tools which cache files

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/11/19 10:11, Craig Skinner wrote: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:42:32 + Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2019/11/07 11:15, Craig Skinner wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:41:07 +0100 Renaud Allard wrote: > > > > Given the amount of people which encrypt /home directory on their > > > >

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Renaud Allard
On 11/19/19 10:00 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: It does avoid the removal issue but it seems an awkward user interface to pass the parent directory. Perhaps better to enforce that the path matches */_sysupgrade, though this also doesn't feel quite right. Perhaps add /_sysupgrade if it wasn't

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Craig Skinner
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:42:32 + Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/11/07 11:15, Craig Skinner wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:41:07 +0100 Renaud Allard wrote: > > > Given the amount of people which encrypt /home directory on their > > > servers, it might be useful to be able to define another

Re: sdhc(4): no 0V one some Intel

2019-11-19 Thread Mike Larkin
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:44:54AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hi, > > on some GPD Pocket mlarkin@ has the eMMC doesn't come up. One issue > is that we shouldn't go to 0V on some/most(?) Intel controllers. This > only adds it for his machine, but I know that the Appollo Lake versions > might

sdhc(4): no 0V one some Intel

2019-11-19 Thread Patrick Wildt
Hi, on some GPD Pocket mlarkin@ has the eMMC doesn't come up. One issue is that we shouldn't go to 0V on some/most(?) Intel controllers. This only adds it for his machine, but I know that the Appollo Lake versions might also work if added to this check. But unless verified I'll not add it.

Re: unwind: log missing config file

2019-11-19 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 03:53:16AM +0100, Florian Obser wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:15:34AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:19:47PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > With that, my initial case is no longer misleading; alternatively, I > > > can implement the

Re: sysupgrade: Allow to use another directory for the sets

2019-11-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/11/18 14:45, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:23:27PM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote: > > > > > > On 11/18/19 10:08 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > > > > > A configuration parameter could be accomplished through an optional > > > symlink > > > /etc/_sysupgrade that the