Small bug, but still...
naddy@ reported a double free when interrupting (^C) ftp(1) at the end
or url_get(). If that happens, the SIGINT handler longjmps and the
cleanup path is taken a second time. To avoid this, restore the
previous SIGINT handler in each possible error path. I chose to
On 2020-06-20, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I can't get this revision of the diff to work on amd64:
> * patch source
> * build and install kernel, reboot
> * make build
> * reboot -> "Process (pid 1) got signal 11"
>
> I'm at a loss. As part of the "make build", the new libc is installed
> and
> From: Christian Weisgerber
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 19:57:06 - (UTC)
>
> On 2020-06-19, Paul Irofti wrote:
>
> > I have addressed your comments bellow, except for the CPU skew one. That
> > code disables TSC for all CPUs, not just for PRIMARY. Would you like to
> > walk and add code for
RDTSC is not a serializing instruction; to make sure we get the TSC
value corresponding to the position of RDTSC in te instruction stream
we need a barrier. Linux uses LFENCE on machines where it is
available. FreeBSD seems to prefer MFENCE for AMD CPUs but uses
LFENCE for Intel CPUs. For now
On 2020-06-19, Paul Irofti wrote:
> I have addressed your comments bellow, except for the CPU skew one. That
> code disables TSC for all CPUs, not just for PRIMARY. Would you like to
> walk and add code for every CPU to check the drift and then disable the
> TSC? It seems a little too much...
>
> From: Al Poole
> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:33:11 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> This introduces temperature driver for the Raspberry PI 4 named bcmtmon.
>
> bcmtmon because of bcmtemp(4) and (!strncmp("bcmt", snsrdev.xname, 4))
>
> @kettenis has been advising me and answering questions.
Thanks,
I made
yasuoka@ privately pointed I was wrong about KASSERT(). I fixed my
diff. These checks are useless and I guess they make understanding
harder so I removed panic() from pppx_if_destoy() too.
Index: sys/net/if_pppx.c
===
RCS file:
On 2020-06-19, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Well... they something in ports might still look at them in
>
> Can someone from ports speak about this?
I have started an amd64 bulk build without .
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Hi!
Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> this is getting in my nerves, I made a wrong assumption here and I
> prefer to commit this than backout my previous commit so I'm asking for
> commits for the below.
attached. I hope I understood your intention.
>
> On 14:43 Fri 19 Jun , Ricardo Mestre wrote:
>
> From: Christian Weisgerber
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 01:20:33 - (UTC)
>
> On 2020-06-19, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > I'm talking about *skew*, not drift. If there is a significant drift
> > you already knock out the TSC.
> >
> > What's needed is:
> >
> > 1. A bit of research of what an
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 02:43:00PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote:
> mea culpa, but I'd rather just remove the unlink of the socket.
>
> OK?
Diff reads OK to me.
We had the same discussion in 2018 for ripd:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=154101413029926=2
Note to self: ospfd should get the
11 matches
Mail list logo
