Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > > diff

sbus.4: remove iommu mention

2020-07-27 Thread Klemens Nanni
There since import from NetBSD, but we have no iommu(4). OK? Index: share/man/man4/sbus.4 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/sbus.4,v retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -p -r1.53 sbus.4 --- share/man/man4/sbus.4 18 Jun 2018

Re: Improve ure(4) performance

2020-07-27 Thread Jonathon Fletcher
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:13:33PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote: > > > > Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch? > > Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will > let you know how things

Re: ssh(1), getrrsetbyname(3), SSHFP and DNSSEC

2020-07-27 Thread Jesper Wallin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:30:52AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26 2020, Jesper Wallin wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 02:01:06PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > >> > >> For those two reasons I think the feature should be opt-in. > > > > Yeah, I agree with

Re: Improve ure(4) performance

2020-07-27 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote: > > Are you ok using patch's -l option for this patch? > Sure, can do. New kernel compiled, will switch my machine tonight. Will let you know how things go. For meetings I would need couple of days, as I don't have Google Meet

Re: Improve ure(4) performance

2020-07-27 Thread Jonathon Fletcher
> On Jul 27, 2020, at 11:47 AM, Mikolaj Kucharski > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:24:55AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote: >> >> I have attached an updated patch - which includes Kevin's changes from >> his earlier email - that also corrects the tx buffer sizes for RTL8153 >> /

Re: Improve ure(4) performance

2020-07-27 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:24:55AM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote: > > I have attached an updated patch - which includes Kevin's changes from > his earlier email - that also corrects the tx buffer sizes for RTL8153 > / RTL8153B devices. > Unfortunately below diff fails to apply. 2 out of 2

Re: Improve ure(4) performance

2020-07-27 Thread Jonathon Fletcher
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:12 PM Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:47:32PM -0700, Jonathon Fletcher wrote: > > Mikolaj, > > > > Thank you for testing my patch. > > > > I am very interested to know what xhci (or ehci) hardware you have. > > > > I have the following: > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > > diff

Re: timekeep: fixing large skews on amd64 with RDTSCP

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:14:21 +0200 > From: Christian Weisgerber > > Scott Cheloha: > > > --- lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c8 Jul 2020 09:17:48 - > > 1.2 > > +++ lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c25 Jul 2020 17:50:38 - > > @@ -21,9 +21,12 @@ > > static inline

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:10:42 -0400 > From: Bryan Steele > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > > diff tries to

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If > you see

Re: timekeep: fixing large skews on amd64 with RDTSCP

2020-07-27 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Scott Cheloha: > --- lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c 8 Jul 2020 09:17:48 - 1.2 > +++ lib/libc/arch/amd64/gen/usertc.c 25 Jul 2020 17:50:38 - > @@ -21,9 +21,12 @@ > static inline u_int > rdtsc(void) > { > - uint32_t hi, lo; > - asm volatile("rdtsc" : "=a"(lo),

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Bryan Steele
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If > you see something

acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If you see something like: "ACPI0007" at acpi0 not configured please try the following