Hi,
I doing some IPv6 setup, I came across an issue with wg(4) and ndp. The
local route is created with RTF_LLINFO, which ndp attempts to print. As
wg is a layer3 tunnel it won't have any link-local information.
This patch just sets if_rtrequest to p2p_rtrequest. Even if wg is
technically
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 20:31:03 +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> I think the fix should be as simple as the diff below. I added a small
> extension of a regress test for this. Unpatched make fails, patched
> make passes.
That looks good to me, I can't think of any problems that moving
the logic into
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:34:55AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:52:46AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Add `t' to swap the WAIT column with RTABLE (and vice versa); WAIT
> > is wide enough to fit RTABLE, somewhat adds additional value to STATE
> > and seems therefore
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:20:22 -0700
> From: Mike Larkin
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:29:15AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 11:45:22PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > This patch (or something equivalent) is a prerequisite to running
I would like to move snmpd(8) to a more modular dispatch/transport map
system, but that's going to be quite the undertaking. To make things a
little better to grok I'd like to split of the trap receiver components
out of struct address as a first step. While doing this I can also
greatly simplify
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:38:20PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
| What you are doing wasn't the purpose of the time field. It was added
| only for time sensors, and it looks like someone added it to other
| sensors. And now it must suddenly be for all of them??
Sorry - I may have introduced some
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:33:32 +0200
> From: Paul de Weerd
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> | > I've dug out my stash of weird usb devices and found another sensor (a
> | > uthum(4), with only temperature support).
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> | > I've dug out my stash of weird usb devices and found another sensor (a
> | > uthum(4), with only temperature support). I have a few other sensors
> | > in live machines too (acpitz(4), cpu(4),
Hi Theo,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:33:28PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
| > I don't understand the point. None of the sensor drivers set that
| > member except the timedelta sensors. I don't think adding code to do
| > so to all sensor drivers makes sense.
|
| That is correct. Non-time
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:19:19 +0200
> > From: Paul de Weerd
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've dug out my stash of weird usb devices and found another sensor (a
> > uthum(4), with only temperature support). I have a few other sensors
> > in live machines too (acpitz(4),
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your reply.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
| > I've dug out my stash of weird usb devices and found another sensor (a
| > uthum(4), with only temperature support). I have a few other sensors
| > in live machines too (acpitz(4), cpu(4),
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:19:19 +0200
> From: Paul de Weerd
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've dug out my stash of weird usb devices and found another sensor (a
> uthum(4), with only temperature support). I have a few other sensors
> in live machines too (acpitz(4), cpu(4), admtemp(4), it(4), maybe some
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:55:45AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 18:11:12 -0500
> > > From: Scott Cheloha
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Other BSDs use the TSC to implement delay(9) if the TSC is constant
> > >
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:29:15AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 11:45:22PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > This patch (or something equivalent) is a prerequisite to running the
> > > > lapic timer in oneshot or TSC deadline mode. Using the lapic
Hi all,
I've dug out my stash of weird usb devices and found another sensor (a
uthum(4), with only temperature support). I have a few other sensors
in live machines too (acpitz(4), cpu(4), admtemp(4), it(4), maybe some
more) that I could look into.
Is there any interest in adding support for
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:55:45AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 18:11:12 -0500
> > From: Scott Cheloha
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Other BSDs use the TSC to implement delay(9) if the TSC is constant
> > and invariant. Here's a patch to add something similar to our kernel.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 07:05:31PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> * Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At the moment ntpd never goes into unsynced mode if network
> > connectivity is lost. The code to do that is only triggered when a
> > pakcet is received, which does not
Hi Otto,
* Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment ntpd never goes into unsynced mode if network
> connectivity is lost. The code to do that is only triggered when a
> pakcet is received, which does not happen.
>
> This diff fixes that by going into unsynced mode if no time data was
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:38:06PM +1000, Matt Dunwoodie wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:54:10 +0200
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:42:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Maxime Villard mentioned a leak due to a missing m_freem() in wg(4):
> > >
Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Does this filter actually work for you? Not by my testing, nor my
> understanding of filters. Filter-dkimsign works during the
> filter-dataline phase, so you'd have to circumvent that one, which is
> not supported.
Finally got around to test it. Found the problem too
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:54:10 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:42:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Maxime Villard mentioned a leak due to a missing m_freem() in wg(4):
> > https://marc.info/?l=netbsd-tech-net=159827988018641=2
> >
> > It seems to be that such
The Rx block ack session counter is not reset when an iwm/iwx interface
disassociates from the AP or is put down via ifconfig.
This can lead to new Rx block ack session being refused upon re-association.
Found by zxystd from the OpenIntelWireless project (drivers for macOS).
The firmware
Does this filter actually work for you? Not by my testing, nor my
understanding of filters. Filter-dkimsign works during the
filter-dataline phase, so you'd have to circumvent that one, which is
not supported.
Personally I'd sign the domain anyway, since it gives the receiver
some additional
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:52:46AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Add `t' to swap the WAIT column with RTABLE (and vice versa); WAIT
> is wide enough to fit RTABLE, somewhat adds additional value to STATE
> and seems therefore most appropiate to hide in favour of RTABLE.
>
> Internally, I renamed
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:42:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Maxime Villard mentioned a leak due to a missing m_freem() in wg(4):
> https://marc.info/?l=netbsd-tech-net=159827988018641=2
>
> It seems to be that such leak is present in other uses of m_defrag() in
> the tree. I won't
Maxime Villard mentioned a leak due to a missing m_freem() in wg(4):
https://marc.info/?l=netbsd-tech-net=159827988018641=2
It seems to be that such leak is present in other uses of m_defrag() in
the tree. I won't take the time to go though all of them, but an audit
would be welcome.
26 matches
Mail list logo
