Re: httpd: call tls_close before closing the socket

2021-01-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 12:07:28AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 11:38:32PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 09:06:34PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > httpd(8) leaks resources when clients connect via TLS. The reason for > > > this is that

Re: [patch] update xterm to version 363

2021-01-01 Thread trondd
On Fri, January 1, 2021 11:29 am, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Hi, > > the attached patch updates xterm to version 363 (from 351) > > Changelog can be found here: > https://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.log.html > > To test, apply the patch in ${XSRCDIR}/app/xterm and rebuild xterm : > > cd

Re: switch(4): don't call if_deactivate() at destroy.

2021-01-01 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 01:40:57AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > Don't call if_deactivate() in switch_clone_destroy(). Following > if_detach() will do this. Yes, OK kn

Re: bridge(4): don't call if_deactivate() at destroy.

2021-01-01 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 01:40:10AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > Don't call if_deactivate() in bridge_clone_destroy(). Following > if_detach() will do this. Yes, OK kn

Re: httpd: call tls_close before closing the socket

2021-01-01 Thread Theo Buehler
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 11:38:32PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 09:06:34PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > httpd(8) leaks resources when clients connect via TLS. The reason for > > this is that server_close() closes the socket underlying the TLS > > connection before

switch(4): don't call if_deactivate() at destroy.

2021-01-01 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
Don't call if_deactivate() in switch_clone_destroy(). Following if_detach() will do this. Index: sys/net/if_switch.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_switch.c,v retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -p -r1.38 if_switch.c ---

bridge(4): don't call if_deactivate() at destroy.

2021-01-01 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
Don't call if_deactivate() in bridge_clone_destroy(). Following if_detach() will do this. Index: sys/net/if_bridge.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_bridge.c,v retrieving revision 1.345 diff -u -p -r1.345 if_bridge.c ---

Re: httpd: call tls_close before closing the socket

2021-01-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 09:06:34PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > httpd(8) leaks resources when clients connect via TLS. The reason for > this is that server_close() closes the socket underlying the TLS > connection before calling tls_close(). > > The currently unchecked tls_close() call fails

httpd: call tls_close before closing the socket

2021-01-01 Thread Theo Buehler
httpd(8) leaks resources when clients connect via TLS. The reason for this is that server_close() closes the socket underlying the TLS connection before calling tls_close(). The currently unchecked tls_close() call fails with EBADF when trying to write out the close_notify in SSL_shutdown().

Re: ftp(1): handle HTTP 308

2021-01-01 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, Dec 31 2020, Lucas wrote: > Weekly bump chrisz@ had a similar diff, already ok'd by kn@ and me. Christopher, would you mind committing it? > Index: fetch.c > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/usr.bin/ftp/fetch.c,v > retrieving

Re: drm(4) memory allocation diff

2021-01-01 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 20:10:45 +1100 > From: Jonathan Gray New diff at the end of this mail. Please test this one instead of the previous one. > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:09:36PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The diff below changes the emulated Linux memory allocation functions > > a bit

Re: drm(4) memory allocation diff

2021-01-01 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 09:51:27 +0100 > From: Otto Moerbeek > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:09:36PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > The diff below changes the emulated Linux memory allocation functions > > a bit such that they only use malloc(9) for allocations smaller than a > > page. This

Re: uvm_fault: amap & anon locking

2021-01-01 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:19:41AM -0300, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > This has been extensively tested as part of the unlocking diff I sent to > many developers. However, I'd appreciate if you could test again because > this diff doesn't include WITNESS and do not unlock the fault handler. Passed

Re: drm(4) memory allocation diff

2021-01-01 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:09:36PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below changes the emulated Linux memory allocation functions > a bit such that they only use malloc(9) for allocations smaller than a > page. This reduces pressure on the "interrupt safe" map and hopefully > will avoid the

Re: drm(4) memory allocation diff

2021-01-01 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:09:36PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below changes the emulated Linux memory allocation functions > a bit such that they only use malloc(9) for allocations smaller than a > page. This reduces pressure on the "interrupt safe" map and hopefully > will avoid the