I made a mistake in my last diff by deleting the memory barriers.
Here is a diff that keeps membar_enter() and membar_exit().
With my last diff, my G5 froze after 15 hours of uptime, and again
after 10 hours of uptime. I'm not sure whether the missing memory
barriers caused the freeze, but I
I have been using this patch from martijn@ and find it really useful. Is
it possible to merge this? Thanks!
Regards,
Anindya
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 07:33:29PM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> I send out an earlier version of this diff to Anindya with some positive
> feedback. Instead of
Seeing your e-mail reminded me that I had asked Philip about adding
support for RTLD_NOLOAD / RTLD_NODELETE last year after seeing instances
of their usage in the tree here and there.
- Forwarded message from Philip Guenther -
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:19:27 -0700
From: Philip Guenther
Hi,
Here a diff for www page: FAQ>PF: Packet Filtering
Just one typo.
Right?
Index: faq/pf/filter.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/pf/filter.html,v
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -r1.97 filter.html
--- faq/pf/filter.html 5
Hi,
Here a diff for www page: FAQ>PF:Getting started
Just some typos
Right?
Index: faq/pf/config.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/pf/config.html,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -r1.66 config.html
--- faq/pf/config.html 5
ok benno@
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2021.05.03 17:37:36 +0200:
> The RTR session was opened with a blocking connect() call. This is rather
> bad if the RTR peer does not exist since then bgpd will block until the
> connect timed out. This diff makes the connect() call
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:33 -0400
> From: George Koehler
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > Makes sense to me. It seems ldd always seems to require a little bit
> > more coercion to produce non-standard binaries. We use linker scripts
> > for the
On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:31:55 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Makes sense to me. It seems ldd always seems to require a little bit
> more coercion to produce non-standard binaries. We use linker scripts
> for the various EFI bootloaders as well.
>
> ok kettenis@
My diff had an extra "pwd"
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 09:00:37 +0200
> From: Sebastien Marie
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Hi,
>
> The following diff adds support for RTLD_NODELETE in ld.so(1).
>
> It helps Qt programs which is using RTLD_NODELETE per default for
> loading
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 09:16:01 +0100
>
> We are due a _SYSTEM_VERSION bump for the clang update, it can ride
> alongside that
We should probably still do a libc minor bump for this since this adds
an interface.
>
> --
> Sent from a phone, apologies for poor
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The RTR session was opened with a blocking connect() call. This is rather
> bad if the RTR peer does not exist since then bgpd will block until the
> connect timed out. This diff makes the connect() call non-blocking.
> With this
We are due a _SYSTEM_VERSION bump for the clang update, it can ride
alongside that
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 10 May 2021 08:01:18 Sebastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
The following diff adds support for RTLD_NODELETE in ld.so(1).
It helps Qt programs which is using
Hi,
The following diff adds support for RTLD_NODELETE in ld.so(1).
It helps Qt programs which is using RTLD_NODELETE per default for
loading plugins.
Without this patch, qgis (for example) is crashing systematically on
exit. With it, it is fine.
If RTLD_NODELETE isn't POSIX, it is widely
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 11:43:55AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:05:06AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:54:31AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Here is where I get confused.
> > >
> > > Why do I want to wait for
14 matches
Mail list logo
