On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:19:37AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> My last change to dsdt.c broke one or two of my cheap little Intel
> "Atom" laptops. Seems my interpretation of the ACPI standard wasn't
> quite right. I went back to the original bug report and I think I
> understand a bit better w
On Wed, 19 May 2021 00:27:51 -0400
George Koehler wrote:
> Here's my new diff. It is a copy of what I sent to ppc@ a moment ago.
> I would ask, "Is it ok to commit?", but while writing this mail, I
> found a 2nd potential problem with memory barriers, so I will need to
> edit this diff yet again
Ah, good. I was just about to provide a diff bringing Steve's 6.9 httpd
to HEAD but I guess that's obsolete then. Happy to see everything's fine.
On 2021-05-20 17:17, Florian Obser wrote:
> I suspect there was one diff too many in Steve's procedure. I provided a
> clean diff for 6.9 in private (d
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:36:23AM -0400, Dave Voutila wrote:
> We don't currently emulate all TSC related features yet. While hacking
> on other issues, I've found some more obnoxious guests (*cough* debian
> *cough*) constantly try to read the IA32_TSC_ADJUST msr every second,
> not getting the h
On 2021-05-20 16:31 +02, Matthias Pressfreund wrote:
> I just tried WordPress again on Firefox and Chrome. No problems.
> Is there an obj folder? If so, maybe try to do 'make clean'
> after step 5.
>
I suspect there was one diff too many in Steve's procedure. I provided a
clean diff for 6.9 in pr
I just tried WordPress again on Firefox and Chrome. No problems.
Is there an obj folder? If so, maybe try to do 'make clean'
after step 5.
On 2021-05-20 16:02, Steve Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I still get a connection error from my Andriod Nextcloud client and Wordpress
> does not work correct
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:35:32AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 18/05/21(Tue) 14:22, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > This diff adds f_modify and f_process callbacks to socket event filters.
> > As a result, socket events are handled using the non-legacy paths in
> > filter_modify() and filter_process
Hi,
I still get a connection error from my Andriod Nextcloud client and
Wordpress does not work correctly on Firefox.
Please see my steps below to ensure I have tested the correct thing.
(patches are attached as well).
Nextcloud and roundcubemail on Firefox work fine.
On Chrome, everythi
Here is an updated diff integrating different suggestions I received.
- use -T (for TLS) instead of -O
- use getsubopt(3) which I didn't know
- manpage tweaks
Eric.
Index: smtp.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtp.1,v
retrie
This patch adds a mutex that serializes access to a kqueue. As a result,
most of kqueue's internals should become safe to run without the kernel
lock. In principle, the patch should allow unlocking kevent(2).
Some notes:
* The existing uses of splhigh() outline where the mutex should be held.
*
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:06:15PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> When I adjusted the capability negotiation to check both sides for
> presence I made the graceful restart capability lose all AFI/SAFI
> elements for the peer capabilities.
>
> This can be viewed with bgpctl show nei: e.g
>
> Descr
We don't currently emulate all TSC related features yet. While hacking
on other issues, I've found some more obnoxious guests (*cough* debian
*cough*) constantly try to read the IA32_TSC_ADJUST msr every second,
not getting the hint when we inject #GP. This floods the kernel message
buffer with thi
Hello,
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:28:19AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> One way to reduce the problems with copyout(9) is to use uvm_vslock() to
> lock the pages. This is what sysctl does but it comes with its own set of
> issues.
>
using uvm_vslock() did not come to my mind, when I was
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:15:54PM +0200, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> Hello Hiltjo,
>
> thanks for looking further than I did...
>
> Moving to tech@...
>
> hil...@codemadness.org (Hiltjo Posthuma), 2021.05.19 (Wed) 16:59 (CEST):
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
>
Am Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:28:19AM +0200 schrieb Claudio Jeker:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:37:38AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 20/05/21(Thu) 03:23, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > > Hrvoje gave a try to experimental diff, which trades rw-locks in pf(4)
> > > for mutexes [1]. Hrvoje soon d
Hello Hiltjo,
thanks for looking further than I did...
Moving to tech@...
hil...@codemadness.org (Hiltjo Posthuma), 2021.05.19 (Wed) 16:59 (CEST):
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> > By accident I noticed that
> >
> > $ ssh -v $host
> >
> > gives me,
On 18/05/21(Tue) 14:22, Visa Hankala wrote:
> This diff adds f_modify and f_process callbacks to socket event filters.
> As a result, socket events are handled using the non-legacy paths in
> filter_modify() and filter_process() of kern_event.c This a step toward
> MP-safety. However, everything st
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:37:38AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/05/21(Thu) 03:23, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hrvoje gave a try to experimental diff, which trades rw-locks in pf(4)
> > for mutexes [1]. Hrvoje soon discovered machine panics, when doing 'pfctl
> > -ss'
> > The callstack
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 10:28:29 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 19/05/21(Wed) 16:17, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:24:42 +0200
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > On 18/05/21(Tue) 12:07, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:02:19 +0200
> > >
On 19/05/21(Wed) 16:17, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:24:42 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > On 18/05/21(Tue) 12:07, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:02:19 +0200
> > > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > > >
> > > > This allows us to not rely on the KER
Hello,
>
>
> with this diff i can't reproduce panic as before. i tried pf with
> routing, veb, tpmr and bridge.
>
> Do you want me to test this diff with parallel diff?
>
I think it makes no sense to test the change around copyout() with parallel
diff as mpi@ points out rwlocks don't
On 20.5.2021. 3:23, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hrvoje gave a try to experimental diff, which trades rw-locks in pf(4)
> for mutexes [1]. Hrvoje soon discovered machine panics, when doing 'pfctl -ss'
> The callstack looks as follows:
>
> panic: acquiring blockable sleep lock with spin
On 20/05/21(Thu) 03:23, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hrvoje gave a try to experimental diff, which trades rw-locks in pf(4)
> for mutexes [1]. Hrvoje soon discovered machine panics, when doing 'pfctl -ss'
> The callstack looks as follows:
>
> [...]
> specific to experimental diff [1]. However this
Hi tech,
Does anybudy know how to debug kernel core with lldb?
I am useing OpenBSD current.
I know how to debug kernel core with target kvm command of gdb by man
crash. However, lldb does not have taeget kvm command. Has target
kvm command implemented yet?
--
ASOU Masato
24 matches
Mail list logo
