Would the core team consider including a minimalist lisp in the base? e.g.
http://t3x.org/klisp/index.html
Going further, openbsd might need to have artificial intelligence oriented
functionality for tasks such as systems management assistance.
Instead of the new-fanged "adaptive machine
Spotted this at the end of a sysupgrade run. No issue with the reboot but
it doesn't look quite right, in particular the newfs_msdos is a bit scary.
[...]
Installing xshare70.tgz 100% |**| 4505 KB00:36
Installing xfont70.tgz 100% |**|
hi Stuart , all,
Thanks for that idea i had not thought of shell aliases in that case...
that would work just fine for my use case / preference ..
cheers...
On Fri 20 Aug 2021, 17:43 Stuart Henderson, wrote:
> Shell aliases are good for that.
>
> I think I'd be happy with 3 seconds by
On 2021-08-28 19:45 +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 05:05:18PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:44:48AM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> > > Based on conversations in another thread, here's a patch documenting
> > > use of /upgrade.site in the
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 05:05:18PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:44:48AM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> > Based on conversations in another thread, here's a patch documenting
> > use of /upgrade.site in the sysupgrade(8) man page.
> >
> > The revised doc references
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:44:48AM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> Based on conversations in another thread, here's a patch documenting
> use of /upgrade.site in the sysupgrade(8) man page.
>
> The revised doc references /upgrade.site and includes examples for
> updating packages from
Based on conversations in another thread, here's a patch documenting
use of /upgrade.site in the sysupgrade(8) man page.
The revised doc references /upgrade.site and includes examples for
updating packages from Sebastien Marie.
--Aaron
Index: sysupgrade.8
Oooh, neat. Thanks for this!
On 2021-08-28 09:26 +02, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:17:51PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
>> Following is patch to add a flag to upgrade packages during
>> rc.firsttime after a sysupgrade.
>>
>
> if you need this flag, is it a ponctual
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:57:23AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> OK?
Late to the party but I agree with this.
OK kn
> Index: traceroute.8
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/traceroute.8,v
> retrieving revision 1.69
>
OK?
Index: traceroute.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/traceroute/traceroute.8,v
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -p -w -r1.69 traceroute.8
--- traceroute.811 Feb 2020 18:41:39 - 1.69
+++ traceroute.828 Aug
On 2021/08/25 22:23, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Stefan Sperling(s...@stsp.name) on 2021.08.25 22:02:02 +0200:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 08:13:26PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> > > On 2021-08-25 18:02 +01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > Trying to announce a network on a wg(4) interface via
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:17:51PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> Following is patch to add a flag to upgrade packages during
> rc.firsttime after a sysupgrade.
>
if you need this flag, is it a ponctual usage (running sysupgrade with
the flag or not, depending the moment) ? or you will use
On 2021/08/27 23:07, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> On 2021-08-27 23:00 -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:17:51 -0500, Aaron Poffenberger
> > wrote:
> >
> > > + ${PKGS} && echo "pkg_add -Iu" >> /etc/rc.firsttime
> >
> > I don't think this addition is worth it, but anyway this
13 matches
Mail list logo
