On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:13:28PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:28:27PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/01/12 04:49, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there anything else which I can do, to help this diff reviwed and
> > > increase the chance
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:08:45PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently packets sent over loopback interface get their checksum
> calculated twice. In the output path it is set and during TCP/IP
> input it is calculated again to be compared with the previous value.
>
> This can be
Hi,
Currently packets sent over loopback interface get their checksum
calculated twice. In the output path it is set and during TCP/IP
input it is calculated again to be compared with the previous value.
This can be avoided by claiming that lo(4) supports hardware checksum
offloading. For each
I just checked and it seems that while zsh supports the pre-POSIX
behavior of "test -t" using fd 1, both dash and bash treat "-t" as
a string by default when there is no fd specified. So I think this
change is fine.
OK millert@ for your revised dif if you add the missing ';' after
the "return
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:10:31PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, 30 May 2023 09:47:08 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> fwiw I agree. Although it doesn't makes much sense to pass an
> argument to id -R, not failing may give the wrong impression.
>
> ok op@ (i'll wait a bit before commiting this in case someone
> disagrees)
OK millert@ as well if you want to
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Claudio made some suggestions to pass the desired modification times
> > >
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Claudio made some suggestions to pass the desired modification times
> > around in a different way, below is an updated patch proposal.
> > I also
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Claudio made some suggestions to pass the desired modification times
> around in a different way, below is an updated patch proposal.
> I also added some instrumentation to also adjust GBRs and TAKs.
>
> RIPE & APNIC
Omar Polo wrote:
> sorry for the delay, this is another mail that I meant to take a look
> earlier...
Thanks for the review, Omar!
> > > together with a small
> > > rewrite in test_eval TO_FILTT case, as it was a bit too difficult for me
> > > to read: it seems that, for legacy reason (haven't
anyone?
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:17:31PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed a missing checksum count in netstat tcp packets sent
> software-checksummed. Turns out that our syn cache does the checksum
> calculation by hand, instead of the established mechanism in ip
> output.
>
sorry for the delay, this is another mail that I meant to take a look
earlier...
On 2023/05/29 16:36:45 +, Lucas wrote:
> Ping.
>
> > Hi tech@,
> >
> > Both test.1 and ksh.1 (under the non-POSIX compatibility flag) state
> > that `test -t` will default to test whether fd 1 is a TTY if the
On 2023/05/29 16:37:39 +, Lucas wrote:
> Ping.
>
> > According to both usage() and id.1, "id -R" doesn't accept any
> > positional arguments. This diff makes program behave like that.
sorry for the delay, i wanted to take a look earlier.
fwiw I agree. Although it doesn't makes much sense
13 matches
Mail list logo