> From: Greg Steuck
> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 13:42:21 -0700
>
> I had firefox crash on me but the core looks suspect. I don't understand
> why `push %r15` is an invalid instruction.
>
> % egdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox ~/firefox.core
> GNU gdb (GDB) 9.2
> ...
> [New process 561871]
>
>
I had firefox crash on me but the core looks suspect. I don't understand
why `push %r15` is an invalid instruction.
% egdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox ~/firefox.core
GNU gdb (GDB) 9.2
...
[New process 561871]
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libc++.so.9.0" is not at the expected
Mikhail Pchelin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:17:32AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding
> > >these drivers to save double effort.
> >
> > Over in freebsd land won't you just use the linux drivers, to "save double
> >
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:17:32AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding
> >these drivers to save double effort.
>
> Over in freebsd land won't you just use the linux drivers, to "save double
> effort"? And how's that going.
>I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding
>these drivers to save double effort.
Over in freebsd land won't you just use the linux drivers, to "save double
effort"? And how's that going.
I'm interested if anyone has already done any research or code regarding
these drivers to save double effort.
I have not gotten nearly enough positive feedback for the previous
iterations of this to be really comfortable this close to release.
This version doesn't solve any of the less common failure cases, but it
makes the normal "fw_update" when there is no network look nicer.
I can look at bringing
Hi
Setting Null MX is a way for domainowners to indicate that the domain
does not accept mail. Currently a Null MX causes a tempfail and the
mail will be queued and tried to resubmitted till a timeout. With the
attached patch a Null MX causes a permfail. This way the sender will
directly get a
Opening a new clean thread.
First of all, I'm sending this message from my patched mail(1), take a
look at the headers. :-)
I tried what each and everyone suggested to me, the only way to know for
sure what works and what doesn't. If you decide that this modification
is too much for a simple
