Re: bt(5), btrace(8): execute END probe and print maps after exit() statement

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 07:17:05PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 18/10/23(Wed) 12:56, Scott Cheloha wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A bt(5) exit() statement causes the btrace(8) interpreter to exit(3) > > immediately. > > > > A BPFtrace exit() statement is more nuanced: the END probe is executed > >

Re: Virtio fix for testing

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 at 15:31, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 at 06:23, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > > > Am 13.08.23 um 17:38 schrieb Tobias Heider: > > You could try something like > > > > -device virtio-scsi-pci,id=scsi > > -drive file=install73.iso,format=raw,id=cdinst,if=none > >

Re: relayd does not delete control socket on shutdown

On 21/10/2023 20:39, Florian Obser wrote: Which was 8 years ago. I don't understand why you see a change in 7.4. Anyway, we decided to not clean up control sockets in any of our privsep daemons because leaving them behind does not cause any issues. I just noticed it today when I tried to use

Re: relayd does not delete control socket on shutdown

On 2023-10-21 14:49 +03, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > Rev 1.140 by florian@ seems to have changed that. > > Do not try to unlink the control socket in an unprivileged child > process on shutdown. > Found while working ontame(2) . > OK benno@ > Which was 8 years

Re: Prevent off-by-one accounting hang in out-of-swap situations

On 21/10/23(Sat) 14:28, Miod Vallat wrote: > > Stuart, Miod, I wonder if this also help for the off-by-one issue you > > are seeing. It might not. > > It makes the aforementioned issue disappear on the affected machine. Thanks at lot for testing! > > Comments, ok? > > > diff --git

Re: bt(5), btrace(8): execute END probe and print maps after exit() statement

On 18/10/23(Wed) 12:56, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Hi, > > A bt(5) exit() statement causes the btrace(8) interpreter to exit(3) > immediately. > > A BPFtrace exit() statement is more nuanced: the END probe is executed > and the contents of all maps are printed before the interpreter exits. > > This

Re: Prevent off-by-one accounting hang in out-of-swap situations

> Stuart, Miod, I wonder if this also help for the off-by-one issue you > are seeing. It might not. It makes the aforementioned issue disappear on the affected machine. > Comments, ok? > diff --git sys/uvm/uvm_pdaemon.c sys/uvm/uvm_pdaemon.c > index 284211d226c..a26a776df67 100644 > ---

Re: relayd does not delete control socket on shutdown

Rev 1.140 by florian@ seems to have changed that. Do not try to unlink the control socket in an unprivileged child process on shutdown. Found while working ontame(2) . OK benno@ G On 21/10/2023 14:41, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: After 7.4 relayd does not unlink

relayd does not delete control socket on shutdown

After 7.4 relayd does not unlink it's socket I've added the following but it's probably not enough. unveil? G Index: relayd.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/relayd.c,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -p -r1.191 relayd.c

Re: 7.3: Squid 6.3 with multiple workers - net.unix.dgram.sendspace too low

On 2023/10/21 09:31, Silamael Darkomen wrote: > On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the > > relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and > > -current) to bump buffers on them. > > Hi Stuart, >

Re: 7.3: Squid 6.3 with multiple workers - net.unix.dgram.sendspace too low

On 20 Oct 2023 19:33, Stuart Henderson wrote: After a few hours digging around, I eventually figured out where the relevant sockets are created and have added a patch (to 7.4-stable and -current) to bump buffers on them. Hi Stuart, Meanwhile I also did some digging and opened a bug at Squid