> >> First, if the two implementations are not going to coexists,
> >> we can just replace table_proc.c.
> >
> > True, though proc-exec was the name used for filters so it may be a good to
> > unify and drop the legacy “proc” name.
> > This will be hidden to users so quite frankly it’s a
On 6/12/21 9:15 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:41:36PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
Hi,
Here is the updated diff, which removes table_proc and adds table_procexec
as the default backend when no backend name matches.
Hi.
I'm not opposed to the idea, but I have a couple
Hi,
Here is the updated diff, which removes table_proc and adds table_procexec as
the default backend when no backend name matches.
With this diff, I have the following configuration for smtpd:
# $OpenBSD: smtpd.conf,v 1.14 2019/11/26 20:14:38 gilles Exp $
# This is the smtpd server
On 6/9/21 10:34 AM, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
On 9 Jun 2021, at 15:47, Aisha Tammy wrote:
On 6/9/21 5:19 AM, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
Hi,
I wrote table_procexec (despite the copyright which I copy-pasted and forgot to
replace author) so just providing a bit of insight:
Ah, I did not know
e 'file', 'db' can be executables in /usr/libexec/smtpd or
absolute paths.
This may be a possible thing to do but maybe it can be done after
procexec is tested a bit.
Hopefully I've addressed the proper concerns.
Best,
Aisha
Gilles
On 8 Jun 2021, at 23:04, Aisha Tammy wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi,
I've attached a slightly updated patch for the procexec.
Ping for someone to take a look :)
Cheers,
Aisha
diff --git a/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpctl/Makefile b/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpctl/Makefile
index ef8148be8c9..2e8beff1ad1 100644
--- a/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpctl/Makefile
+++
Hi all,
I've attached a diff to add table_procexec as a table backend
in smtpd(8). This imports the table_procexec from opensmtpd-extras,
which is available upstream but is not present in the port.
I've successfully replaced the standard aliases table
table aliases file:/etc/mail/aliases
with
On 5/11/21 9:04 PM, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:13:55AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
I'd like to drop SWAT, unofficial and dropped by the samba project
around the switch to samba4.
- moved smtps/465 to the standards section (rfc8314)
The new service was
On 1/27/21 7:29 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> January 27, 2021 9:47 AM, "Lauri Tirkkonen" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 27 2021 09:36:31 +0100, Eric Faurot wrote:
>>
>>> There has been a plan for some time now to make smtpd use libtls
>>> instead of openssl. Recent changes in libtls allow to move
Hi,
While creating a portable version of imsg, I noticed
a small typo in the imsg_init.3 man page which says
the returned value is 'len' instead of 'datalen'.
Attached the patch to fix it.
OK?
Cheers,
Aisha
diff --git a/lib/libutil/imsg_init.3 b/lib/libutil/imsg_init.3
index
h
a ~3050 line file in the table.
Aisha
> On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 14:46 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> Could you try the diff below?
>> It should do exactly the same thing with less code.
>>
>> martijn@
>>
>> On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 08:30 -0400, Aisha T
Message
Subject: Re: opensmtpd can't handle long lines in aliases table
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:47:33 -0500
From: Edgar Pettijohn
To: AIsha Tammy
Here are a few simple patches as discussed. These were written to apply
against current. However, they are pretty simple and may well apply
On 9/10/20 2:03 AM, Robert Klein wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 18:47:08 -0400
> Aisha Tammy wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the late reply.
>>
>> On 8/12/20 8:19 AM, Robert Klein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:00:18 +0200
>>> T
Sorry for the late reply.
On 8/12/20 8:19 AM, Robert Klein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:00:18 +0200
> Theo Buehler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:22:51PM -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>>> Another bump.
>>
>> I think this is usefu
On 8/2/20 9:34 AM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> On 7/26/20 5:25 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>> On 7/26/20 5:21 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Am reviving an old thread from
>>> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=152663835315469=4
>>> (i did cc reyk@ sorry
On 7/26/20 5:25 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> On 7/26/20 5:21 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Am reviving an old thread from
>> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=152663835315469=4
>> (i did cc reyk@ sorry if it is noise)
>>
>> For some reason seems like th
On 7/26/20 5:21 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi,
> Am reviving an old thread from
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=152663835315469=4
> (i did cc reyk@ sorry if it is noise)
>
> For some reason seems like the patch didn't go through...
>
> I am reattaching it here, maybe
Hi,
Am reviving an old thread from
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=152663835315469=4
(i did cc reyk@ sorry if it is noise)
For some reason seems like the patch didn't go through...
I am reattaching it here, maybe someone can take a look and
see if it can be merged ?
Getting sshPublicKey
On 6/13/20 2:47 PM, Theo Buehler wrote:
>>> Yes. The thing is that you need to convince yourself that this is still
>>> uniformly distributed over the wanted numbers. But it's correct. In
>>> fact, it's enough to flip a fixed bit, so you can get away with one call
>>> to arc4random().
>>
>> Its
On 6/13/20 9:19 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 08:46:13AM -0400, David Higgs wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:41 AM Theo Buehler wrote:
>>
>>> I finally found the time to think about the mathematics of this some
>>> more and I'm now convinced that it's a sound construction.
20 matches
Mail list logo
