tend to be larger and
more precise, so maybe we want to drop it at some point in the future?
Given that up to now, nobody else reported a problem with it, I'd prefer
to leave it in the set of "inofficial" configuration options.
On 10/14/20 9:13 PM, Brennan Vincent wrote:
Oops, the subj
Oops, the subject should be "Expose touchpad _decleration threshold_ in
wsconsctl". Not sure why I wrote "sensitivity".
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Brennan Vincent wrote:
>
> diff --git sbin/wsconsctl/mouse.c sbin/wsconsctl/mouse.c
> index e04642dacbc..0f1594e17e0 100644
diff --git sbin/wsconsctl/mouse.c sbin/wsconsctl/mouse.c
index e04642dacbc..0f1594e17e0 100644
--- sbin/wsconsctl/mouse.c
+++ sbin/wsconsctl/mouse.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct field mouse_field_tab[] = {
{ "tp.swapsides", _swapsides, FMT_CFG,FLG_NORDBACK },
{
Got it. Thanks for the explanation.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016, at 01:36 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/04/10 20:50, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What's the use for this? What program could use it?
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 08:48:
could use it?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 08:48:08AM -0700, Brennan Vincent wrote:
> > Subject basically says it all. I think some could find it useful to have
> > `pledge` promises optionally persist even after the process calls
> > execve. This could, for example,
Subject basically says it all. I think some could find it useful to have
`pledge` promises optionally persist even after the process calls
execve. This could, for example, be implemented with an `exec_noreset`
pledge that gives access to the same syscalls as `exec`, but with this
restricted
