On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > To get a response with the AD flag set, the request itself also needs
> > to have the AD flag set.
I re-read your post again and see you already clarified this.
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> To get a response with the AD flag set, the request itself also needs
> to have the AD flag set.
...
> -#define RES_DEFAULT(RES_RECURSE | RES_DEFNAMES | RES_DNSRCH)
> +#define RES_DEFAULT(RES_RECURSE | RES_DEFNAMES | RES_DNSRCH | RES_USE_AD)
C
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> An excellent (although secondary) source from the precambrian era,
>Morris I Bolsky
>"The /vi/ User's Hanbdbook"
>(c) 1984 by Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated
>(c) 1985 by AT&T Technologies, Inc
>published by Prentice-Hal
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:57:04PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > I am running as a VMware guest.
> >
> > OpenBSD 5.1 GENERIC#181 amd64 amd64
> >
> > dmesg says it is:
> > cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620
so if there anything you would
like me to test or details to provide, please let me know.
Thank you,
Jeremy C. Reed
echo 'EhZ[h ^jjf0%%h[[Zc[Z_W$d[j%Xeeai%ZW[ced#]dk#f[d]k_d%' | \
tr'#-~''\-.-{'
My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on
multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw
that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always
return 0. (I was able to reproduce this.)
If this is expected behaviour, plea
dmesg output is at http://www.reedmedia.net/~reed/tmp/dmesg-openbsd.txt
Using:
OpenBSD 5.1-beta (GENERIC.MP) #190: Mon Jan 30 16:20:45 MST 2012
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
iwn0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel WiFi Link 1030" rev 0x34: msi, MIMO
1T2R,
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > fixed, thanks. but i'm confused - if originally -g requested group info
> > > "be included", why did the man page say (of group info) "though not for
> > > -g"? should that passage read "excluded" instead? anyone know?
> >
> > Sorry -- after checkin
tail -r
