Hello,
I've been perusing some of the ksh scripts within /usr/sbin/ and noticed some
differences in coding style and shell syntax usage.
Is there an "official" OpenBSD ksh style guide or a list of recommendations?
For example, syspatch, sysupgrade and sysmerge all use double square brackets
on. I'm sure noone is against this patch then.
>
> The code in typeset() function, which is responsible for almost all
> shell variable tweaking, contains a bug: in case of array it passes
> "foo=var" instead of only variable name ("foo"), if the value was
> ever g
On 1/26/21 12:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/01/26 11:18, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
>>
>> On 1/26/21 5:47 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2021/01/25 00:53, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>>>> Sebastian Benoit(be...@openbsd.org) on 2021.01.25 00:2
On 1/26/21 5:47 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/01/25 00:53, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>> Sebastian Benoit(be...@openbsd.org) on 2021.01.25 00:27:05 +0100:
>>> Theo de Raadt(dera...@openbsd.org) on 2021.01.24 16:01:32 -0700:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/01/24 12:10, Theo
On 1/24/21 3:53 PM, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> And we already have -z for "force grep to behave as zgrep".
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but '-Z' (uppercase) appears to
be the flag for "Force grep to behave as zgrep." The '-z' (lowercase) is
currently unused/invalid in our
On 12/30/20 4:59 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/12/30 00:12, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed some dead links on the octeon.html page for the Portwell and Rhino
>> devices.
>>
>> The Portwell link has been pointed to archi
Hello,
I noticed some dead links on the octeon.html page for the Portwell and
Rhino devices.
The Portwell link has been pointed to archive.org and the Rhino links
now point to correct URL after Rhino Labs changed their website around.
I've attached the patch rather that inlining it as I'm
On 12/18/20 5:04 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
On 12/17/20 3:15 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Hi,
as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses.
This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug:
selecting v6 or v4 addresses only from resolv.conf via the -4
On 12/17/20 3:15 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Hi,
as noted on misc dig does not like to talk to local link addresses.
This fixes that case. While investigating I also found another bug:
selecting v6 or v4 addresses only from resolv.conf via the -4 or -6
command line argument does not work as
On 11/16/20 12:15 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 08:53:36AM +0100, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
| On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 08:51:22PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| > Hi all,
| >
| > I misread find(1) and did:
| >
| > [weerdpom] $ find path/to/cam -name
On 2020-10-13 07:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020/10/11 15:37, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 10/10/2020 22:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Here's an update to the recently released version of Unbound. Much of
the additional code is for DoH and is unused here as it requires the
nghttp2 library.
On 2020-10-08 16:39, Klemens Nanni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:23:53PM -0700, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
This improved error message would have been useful a few months ago where I
had a number of end-users of one of my scripts get confused due to the
cryptic error messages spit out
Hi Klemens,
I'm not a dev, so I can't give you an OK, but I just wanted to say that
I certainly support this change.
This improved error message would have been useful a few months ago
where I had a number of end-users of one of my scripts get confused due
to the cryptic error messages spit
On 2020-08-10 08:49, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09 2020, Ross L Richardson wrote:
At present, if a request contains no "Host:" header [HTTP pre-1.1] or
if the supplied header does not match any of the servers configured
in httpd.conf, the request is directed to the first
Hello,
This is my first diff I've submitted here, so I imagine there's a dozen
things I'm missing/clueless about.
I've been making an effort to start browsing the tree and reading the
code regularly. I came across this file, I know it's a regress test, so
there may be some context/history
On 2020-03-16 06:01, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 3/15/20 9:53 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020/03/15 19:05, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 15/03/2020 17:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Lots of churn again.. most of the new + are related to the new rpz and
serve-stale support. I've been running it
On 5/23/19 2:35 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 19:50 Denis wrote:
SCTP(4) present in FreeBSD 12.0
OpenBSD implementation planned?
Nothing planned as far as I know.
Out of curiosity - what is your use case? Do you really use it? It doesn’t
seem to be a widely used
On 4/1/19 9:03 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On 4/1/19 3:18 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
While I support pf removal, I don't think bpf is the way to go.
FreeBSD just removed their pf [1] so the code is up for grabs and you
can import it with one weird trick.
[1]
18 matches
Mail list logo
