[patch] sndio.7

2012-12-21 Thread Martin Toft
One typo and two style issues: --- sndio.7.orig2012-12-21 17:55:39.415008759 +0100 +++ sndio.7 2012-12-21 18:01:20.607018154 +0100 @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ while doing all necessary conversions on the fly. It can mix multiple streams or split the hardware into multiple subdevices, to allow

Re: [patch] sndio.7

2012-12-21 Thread Martin Toft
-There's no hardware involved: thru boxes are created by +There is no hardware involved: thru boxes are created by i don;t see why this is an improvement. what's wrong with it? Well, I didn't mean it was wrong or a bug, but the relaxed style seemed inconsistent with the rest of the page

Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC

2010-12-21 Thread Martin Toft
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:28:51AM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote: # if there's no /var/db/host.random, make one through /dev/urandom ^ if [ ! -f /var/db/host.random ]; then - dd if=/dev/urandom of=/var/db/host.random bs=1024

Re: [patch] pf.conf

2010-07-28 Thread Martin Toft
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:25:27PM +0200, Thordur I Bjornsson wrote: Each rule is supposed to be usable as it stands, this is also an example ruleset, so removing lo0 is not going to happen (this was actually discussed not so long ago among developers). That makes sense. I thought about it

Re: better cpu throttling

2010-07-01 Thread Martin Toft
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:32:26PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: I like this one better. Slow down the poll interval just a little so it's not so hysterical, but also go straight to 100. If you need CPU, you need CPU. It still backs down slowly, but that's just to prevent getting caught in slow

Re: kernel cpu perf tuning

2010-06-30 Thread Martin Toft
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:57:00PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: Here's a first cut at throwing some code into the kernel. You'll definitely want to kill apmd if you're running it. It's rather rough, in the wrong spot, and so on, but it's a place to start for further hacking. I'm not

cwmrc(5)

2009-08-04 Thread Martin Toft
Because it is more consistent with the documentation for the other options, and because e.g. autogroup 1 ``XTerm'' in .cwmrc doesn't work: Index: cwmrc.5 === RCS file: /cvs/xenocara/app/cwm/cwmrc.5,v retrieving revision 1.25 diff