thank you for looking at this.
ive committed it with tweaks based on your suggestions.
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 22:15, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:48:03PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> cos its not resizing the allocation, its allocating them for
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:48:03PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> cos its not resizing the allocation, its allocating them for new cpus.
realloc is not a good name, so yes to renaming.
> the same goes for counters_realloc being named counters_alloc_ncpus.
Does the n mean new? This is never
David Gwynne wrote:
> cos its not resizing the allocation, its allocating them for new cpus.
>
> the same goes for counters_realloc being named counters_alloc_ncpus.
>
> this adds doco for them too.
Hi,
FWIW it makes sense to me, for when I was looking at the per-cpu mbstat
diff, I blocked a
cos its not resizing the allocation, its allocating them for new cpus.
the same goes for counters_realloc being named counters_alloc_ncpus.
this adds doco for them too.
ok?
Index: share/man/man9/counters_alloc.9
===
RCS file: