Re: [PATCH] Report versioned lib.so in cc --print-file-name given short name

2022-02-28 Thread Greg Steuck
t. Otherwise, OK? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Greg >> > >> >> From 447d158494ce4a1b4986f16e3bc2ef057712fe27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Greg Steuck >> > Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:28:43 -0800 >> > Subject: [PATCH] Rep

Re: [PATCH] Report versioned lib.so in cc --print-file-name given short name

2022-02-27 Thread Todd Mortimer
, I'm open to not duplicating > > it. Otherwise, OK? > > > > Thanks > > Greg > > > >> From 447d158494ce4a1b4986f16e3bc2ef057712fe27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Greg Steuck > > Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:28:43 -0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] Report versioned lib

Re: [PATCH] Report versioned lib.so in cc --print-file-name given short name

2022-02-25 Thread Greg Steuck
> From: Greg Steuck > Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:28:43 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] Report versioned lib.so in cc --print-file-name given short > name > > E.g. `cc --print-file-name libc.so` reports /usr/lib/libc.so.96.1 > > This is a complement of the major.minor finding logic in

[PATCH] Report versioned lib.so in cc --print-file-name given short name

2022-02-14 Thread Greg Steuck
body has a good idea where the identical code could live, I'm open to not duplicating it. Otherwise, OK? Thanks Greg >From 447d158494ce4a1b4986f16e3bc2ef057712fe27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Steuck Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:28:43 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Report versioned lib.so in cc -