On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:04 PM Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:49:09AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:33 AM Jason McIntyre
> wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > i have to say, i'm getting nowhere with this SYNOPSIS:
> > >
> > > netstat -r [-AFu]
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 08:02:54PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:49:09AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:33 AM Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > i have to say, i'm getting nowhere with this SYNOPSIS:
> > >
> > > netstat -r
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:58:47PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:21:08PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:08:15PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:32:18AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > next step is
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:31:26PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> anyway, how about this text for ipcomp/ipsec?
> jmc
>
for completeness sake, here's the full diff.
jmc
Index: sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.8
===
RCS file:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:49:09AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:33 AM Jason McIntyre wrote:
> ...
>
> > i have to say, i'm getting nowhere with this SYNOPSIS:
> >
> > netstat -r [-AFu] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system]
> > [-p
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:33 AM Jason McIntyre wrote:
...
> i have to say, i'm getting nowhere with this SYNOPSIS:
>
> netstat -r [-AFu] [-f address_family] [-M core] [-N system]
> [-p protocol] [-T rtable]
>
> i mean the combination of -r and -p. is it wholly
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:35:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/12/22 17:58, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > > flag.
> > > > Just like for IPsec, using the
> > > > -.Fl r
> > > > -flag,
> > > > -.Xr netstat 1
> > > > +.Xr route 8
> > > > +.Cm show
> > > > +command
> > > > displays
On 2022/12/22 17:58, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > flag.
> > > Just like for IPsec, using the
> > > -.Fl r
> > > -flag,
> > > -.Xr netstat 1
> > > +.Xr route 8
> > > +.Cm show
> > > +command
> > > displays information about IPComp flows.
> >
> > That's a lie. Neither netstat nor route show IPsec
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:21:08PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:08:15PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:32:18AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > >
> > > next step is to examine Xr. will get round to that when i can.
> > >
> >
> > so i
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:08:15PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:32:18AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > next step is to examine Xr. will get round to that when i can.
> >
>
> so i looked at where we are using netstat. a lot of the references still
> make sense.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:32:18AM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> next step is to examine Xr. will get round to that when i can.
>
so i looked at where we are using netstat. a lot of the references still
make sense. diff below is for ones i think we can change. claudio kindly
help me sift
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:21:16AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > In the old world only netstat could show the routing table. I think this
> > is still the case in FreeBSD for example. We added route show at some
> > point but the documentation was not shared between
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Good news, I've got my MUA sorted. Hopefully this fixes the issues with
> the CVS diffs in my reply body.
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:09:24PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > i like the choice of "display" over "print out".
>
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i would not remove the Xr. i think if we go ahead with this, we can make
> a separate commit where we point people to route(8) rather than
> netstart(8), but i suspect many pages will both want references to both.
netstat, not netstart, heh
But yes it is true that some
Good news, I've got my MUA sorted. Hopefully this fixes the issues with
the CVS diffs in my reply body.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:09:24PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i like the choice of "display" over "print out".
> i don;t like the "related metadata" bit though.
>
> what about just
>
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:41:42PM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> > So I think route.8 is where we should try to have complete documentation,
> > and once that is done we should change Xr's and other documentation to
> > point at route.8 instead of netstat.8
>
> In an effort to have my
> So I think route.8 is where we should try to have complete documentation,
> and once that is done we should change Xr's and other documentation to
> point at route.8 instead of netstat.8
In an effort to have my interactions on this list wind up being helpful
rather than more work for overworked
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> In the old world only netstat could show the routing table. I think this
> is still the case in FreeBSD for example. We added route show at some
> point but the documentation was not shared between the manpages.
> I agree that it is annoying to open up the netstat man page
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 04:48:38PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:43:18AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:27 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Heyya tech@,
> > >
> > > Please keep me on cc, I'm not subscribed
> >
> > Please
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:43:18AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:27 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > Heyya tech@,
> >
> > Please keep me on cc, I'm not subscribed
>
> Please keep me on cc. The last message wasn't sent to me, so my In-Reply-To
> is going to be
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:27 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> Heyya tech@,
>
> Please keep me on cc, I'm not subscribed
Please keep me on cc. The last message wasn't sent to me, so my In-Reply-To
is going to be wrong. I'm not subscribed to tech@.
>From the web:
> some of the relevant flags are
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:27:14PM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> Heyya tech@,
>
> Please keep me on cc, I'm not subscribed
>
> I've been working on porting some of my linux specific software to
> work on OpenBSD. While working with some routing-specific code,
> I needed to pull up show.c
Heyya tech@,
Please keep me on cc, I'm not subscribed
I've been working on porting some of my linux specific software to
work on OpenBSD. While working with some routing-specific code,
I needed to pull up show.c to map the letters in `route show` to the
RTF_ values.
I figured while I was in
23 matches
Mail list logo
