...and another bump. :-) *ping sthen@*
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 07:25:33PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:50:46PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> > Woups, seems like I managed to break ftp(1) in the installer due to
> > pledge being a bit too tight. Here is an updated
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:50:46PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Woups, seems like I managed to break ftp(1) in the installer due to
> pledge being a bit too tight. Here is an updated version of the patch
> and with Philips changes as well.
...and hopefully a final version, sorry for the noise.
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Yeah, fully understandable. I'll bump this once 6.2 is out.
>
> I'll apply the changes Philip suggested (thanks!) and then build a
> release to verify that everything works.
>
>
Woups, seems like I managed to break ftp(1) in the
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:12:32AM BST, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > This is unrelated to your diff but what I do instead is to check
> > the BUILDINFO file - it's tiny and all the information you need,
> > is already there.
>
> While we're on the subject, I'll point out that
Yeah, the SHA256.sig should be enough and just veify that everything is
correct. If not, fetch the incorrect sets again. I just wanted to give
a brief explaination on how I noticed this inconsistency. But yeah,
thanks for pointing me to a better solution.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:12:32AM
Raf Czlonka wrote:
> This is unrelated to your diff but what I do instead is to check
> the BUILDINFO file - it's tiny and all the information you need,
> is already there.
While we're on the subject, I'll point out that sometimes only the base sets
change, but not the x sets. If you download
Yeah, fully understandable. I'll bump this once 6.2 is out.
I'll apply the changes Philip suggested (thanks!) and then build a
release to verify that everything works.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:35:03PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I like this, but it's rather late in the release cycle to
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:56:51PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:01:57PM BST, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My morning routine consists of downloading the latest snapshot files and
> > running the upgrade. To avoid wasting bandwidth and time, I check the
> >
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Jesper Wallin wrote:
...
> The patch below will use the Last-Modified header in order to set the
> modification time for http or https links. I also added, what to me
> looked like a missing "\n" on the error message in ftp.c.
...
> --- fetch.c 7 Mar 2017 08:00:23 -
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:01:57PM BST, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My morning routine consists of downloading the latest snapshot files and
> running the upgrade. To avoid wasting bandwidth and time, I check the
> local modification time of INSTALL.amd64, fetch the remote one and check
>
I like this, but it's rather late in the release cycle to be adding
features to ftp(1), could you send a reminder when we're at 6.2-current?
(Also, if you haven't already done so, check that "make release" and the
installer still work).
On 2017/09/22 22:01, Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
My morning routine consists of downloading the latest snapshot files and
running the upgrade. To avoid wasting bandwidth and time, I check the
local modification time of INSTALL.amd64, fetch the remote one and check
if the modification time has changed.
A few days ago, the mirror I use
12 matches
Mail list logo
