Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:10:12 -0600 (MDT) Theo de Raadt
<dera...@openbsd.org>
> CVSROOT:      /cvs
> Module name:  www
> Changes by:   dera...@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/03/15 07:10:12
> 
> Modified files:
>       .              : errata57.html errata58.html errata59.html 
> 
> Log message:
> release new errata

A very insignificant patch proposal, and a question on applying
the same minor change to other two errata pages in maintenance.

Please see 2 validation reports for the errata59.html page here:

[http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.openbsd.org/errata59.html]
[http://www.htmlhelp.org/cgi-bin/validate.cgi?url=http://www.openbsd.org/errata59.html]

Similar to the previous patch proposal for faq/current.html:

[http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=145865833130449&w=4]

While errata pages are much higher importance, copy to Theo de Raadt.

Below is a single patch [1] to change the id to start with a letter
"r" (errata, revision, record), instead of a digit like this sample:

<li id="003_pledge">
<li id="r003_pledge">

This allows the document to validate correct, and if you approve, will
follow similar pattern change for the relevant errata5{7,8}.html too.

Please advise if this then should be followed with a patch for the old
historic errata pages, although I would not insist on it frankly.

[1] Here is the proposed patch, hope this applies without mangling:

$ diff -u errata59.html{-1.3,}
--- errata59.html-1.3   Thu Mar 24 00:22:33 2016
+++ errata59.html       Thu Mar 24 00:27:34 2016
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
 
 <ul>
 
-<li id="001_sshd">
+<li id="r001_sshd">
 <font color="#009000"><strong>001: SECURITY FIX: March 10, 2016</strong></font>
 &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
 <a href="http://www.openssh.com/txt/x11fwd.adv";>
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
 A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
 <p>
 
-<li id="002_in6bind">
+<li id="r002_in6bind">
 <font color="#009000"><strong>002: SECURITY FIX: March 16, 2016</strong></font>
 &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
 Insufficient checks in IPv6 socket binding and UDP IPv6 option
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
 A source code patch exists which remedies this problem.</a>
 <p>
 
-<li id="003_pledge">
+<li id="r003_pledge">
 <font color="#009000"><strong>003: RELIABILITY FIX: March 16, 
2016</strong></font>
 &nbsp; <i>All architectures</i><br>
 Incorrect path processing in pledge_namei() could result in unexpected

Reply via email to