On 02/08/23(Wed) 18:27, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:15:20AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > Now that the proc0 wakeup(9) is gone we can retry the other part of
> > the uvm_meter() patch.
> >
> > uvm_meter() is meant to run every 5 seconds, but for historical
> > reasons it is
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:15:20AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> Now that the proc0 wakeup(9) is gone we can retry the other part of
> the uvm_meter() patch.
>
> uvm_meter() is meant to run every 5 seconds, but for historical
> reasons it is called from schedcpu() and it is scheduled against the
>
Now that the proc0 wakeup(9) is gone we can retry the other part of
the uvm_meter() patch.
uvm_meter() is meant to run every 5 seconds, but for historical
reasons it is called from schedcpu() and it is scheduled against the
UTC clock. schedcpu() and uvm_meter() have different periods, so
uvm_mete
