On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:13:48PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> In sysctl_file() splnet() is no longer what we want. Arguably the
> KERNEL_LOCK() should be enough, but since pf(4) is messing with these
> tables, and nobody turned this part of pf(4) MP, let's require the
> NET_LOCK().
>
> ok?
In sysctl_file() splnet() is no longer what we want. Arguably the
KERNEL_LOCK() should be enough, but since pf(4) is messing with these
tables, and nobody turned this part of pf(4) MP, let's require the
NET_LOCK().
ok?
Index: kern/kern_sysctl.c
===