On Tue, 30 May 2023 09:47:08 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> fwiw I agree. Although it doesn't makes much sense to pass an
> argument to id -R, not failing may give the wrong impression.
>
> ok op@ (i'll wait a bit before commiting this in case someone
> disagrees)
OK millert@ as well if you want to
On 2023/05/29 16:37:39 +, Lucas wrote:
> Ping.
>
> > According to both usage() and id.1, "id -R" doesn't accept any
> > positional arguments. This diff makes program behave like that.
sorry for the delay, i wanted to take a look earlier.
fwiw I agree. Although it doesn't makes much sense
Ping.
> According to both usage() and id.1, "id -R" doesn't accept any
> positional arguments. This diff makes program behave like that.
diff refs/heads/master refs/heads/id-R-usage
commit - 55055d619d36cc45f8c6891404c51cd405214e86
commit + 214ec9c042895b8482378b6ee43530ce4ffe9e21
blob -
According to both usage() and id.1, "id -R" doesn't accept any
positional arguments. This diff makes program behave like that.
-Lucas
diff refs/heads/master refs/heads/id-R-usage
commit - 55055d619d36cc45f8c6891404c51cd405214e86
commit + 214ec9c042895b8482378b6ee43530ce4ffe9e21
blob -
