On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:19:11PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The overflow check for the relative metric adjustments of filtersets
> assumes a certain overflow behaviour of signed integers. I think it is
> better to write this in a way that does not involve an overflow.
>
Here a small follow u
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 06:49:38AM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:19:11 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > The overflow check for the relative metric adjustments of filtersets
> > assumes a certain overflow behaviour of signed integers. I think it is
> > better to write this
On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:19:11 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The overflow check for the relative metric adjustments of filtersets
> assumes a certain overflow behaviour of signed integers. I think it is
> better to write this in a way that does not involve an overflow.
OK millert@ though I think >
The overflow check for the relative metric adjustments of filtersets
assumes a certain overflow behaviour of signed integers. I think it is
better to write this in a way that does not involve an overflow.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: rde_filter.c