At 06:40, Ted Unangst wrote:
> A simple mistake not easily corrected, but of no consequence.
Thanks — this is what I was hoping would be the case.
Delan Azabani wrote:
> Are there any interesting reasons behind this difference (aside from
> a simple mistake in either the implementation or the paper)?
>
> Does the difference in order have any cryptanalytic implications (it
> would surprise me if there were, but I’m not really a
While trying to implement bcrypt based on the USENIX 99 paper alone, a
tiny difference between the paper and src/lib/libc/crypt/bcrypt.c left
me scratching my head until I finally gave in and had a peek.
Since it was first checked in, bcrypt.c has passed the key to the odd
Blowfish_expand0state