Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-11-09 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe > > to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big > > step in this direction and I'd

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-11-04 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe > to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big > step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if people could test > it with their usual network setup and

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-09-02 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:47:31PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Smaller diff now that rtisvalid(9) is in! > +rt_isvalid(struct rtentry *rt) > +/* > + * Returns 1 if the (cached) ``rt'' entry is still valid, 0 otherwise. > + */ > +int > +rtisvalid(struct rtentry *rt) > +{ > + if

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-09-01 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 31/08/15(Mon) 11:52, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 25/08/15(Tue) 12:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe > > > to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big > >

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-08-31 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 25/08/15(Tue) 12:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe > > to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big > > step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-08-27 Thread Norman Golisz
Hello Martin, On Tue Aug 25 2015 12:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big step in this direction and I'd really

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-08-25 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if people could test it with their usual network setup and

Re: Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-08-13 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 12/08/15(Wed) 17:03, Martin Pieuchot wrote: I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if people could test it with their usual network setup and

Call for Testing: rtalloc(9) change

2015-08-12 Thread Martin Pieuchot
I'm currently working on the routing table interface to make is safe to use by multiple CPUs at the same time. The diff below is a big step in this direction and I'd really appreciate if people could test it with their usual network setup and report back. The goal of this diff is to cache the