On 28/05/14(Wed) 16:15, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 15:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes but that was removed as useless so
I'm not sure why we want/need to add them back. I'm not a
On 26/05/14(Mon) 15:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes but that was removed as useless so
I'm not sure why we want/need to add them back. I'm not a routing
table guru so perhaps this is different in
On 28 May 2014 10:15, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 15:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes but that was removed as useless so
I'm not sure why we want/need to add them
On 28 May 2014 10:18, Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 May 2014 10:15, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 15:17, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes but that was
Diff below changes the behavior of the kernel to add a route for every
new IPv4 address, when it is configured on an interface. Actually
such route is created the first time a program tries to resolve it.
That's why with this diff you don't see the cloned flag:
-10.3.3.2
On 26 May 2014 06:10, Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org wrote:
Diff below changes the behavior of the kernel to add a route for every
new IPv4 address, when it is configured on an interface. Actually
such route is created the first time a program tries to resolve it.
That's why with
* Kenneth Westerback kwesterb...@gmail.com [2014-05-26 14:05]:
dhclient used to create such routes but that was removed as useless so
I'm not sure why we want/need to add them back. I'm not a routing
table guru so perhaps this is different in some way.
there is a broad difference between the
On 26/05/14(Mon) 08:03, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
[...]
dhclient used to create such routes but that was removed as useless so
I'm not sure why we want/need to add them back. I'm not a routing
table guru so perhaps this is different in some way.
We want it back to be able to tell if an
