On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:10:12PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 18/08/20(Tue) 15:30, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Diff below changes the order of operations in kqueue_register() to get
> > > rid of an unnecessary pool_get().
On 18/08/20(Tue) 15:30, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below changes the order of operations in kqueue_register() to get
> > rid of an unnecessary pool_get(). When an event is already present on
> > the list try to acquire it first.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below changes the order of operations in kqueue_register() to get
> rid of an unnecessary pool_get(). When an event is already present on
> the list try to acquire it first. Note that knote_acquire() may sleep
> in which
On 18/08/20(Tue) 11:22, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:04:47 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > Diff below changes the order of operations in kqueue_register() to get
> > rid of an unnecessary pool_get(). When an event is already present on
> > the list try to acquire
> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:04:47 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> Diff below changes the order of operations in kqueue_register() to get
> rid of an unnecessary pool_get(). When an event is already present on
> the list try to acquire it first. Note that knote_acquire() may sleep
> in which
Diff below changes the order of operations in kqueue_register() to get
rid of an unnecessary pool_get(). When an event is already present on
the list try to acquire it first. Note that knote_acquire() may sleep
in which case the list might have changed so the lookup has to always
begin from the
