Am Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:32:38AM -0700 schrieb Bob Beck:
> Various spec docs seem all over the place on this, so I am also
> paging Dr. Posix in this email... Hi Philip! :) Is isdigit()
> safe from being screwed up by locale or not?
I think this POSIX.1-2017 (i.e. Open Group Issue 7), locales
Hi Todd, hi Bob,
Todd C. Miller wrote on Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:59:20AM -0700:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:32:38 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
>> So isdigit(3) says in the first paragraph that
>> 'The complete list of decimal digits is 0 and 1-9, in any locale.'
The intended meaning of this sentence was
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:32:38 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> So isdigit(3) says in the first paragraph that
>
> 'The complete list of decimal digits is 0 and 1-9, in any locale.'
>
> Later on it says:
>
> 'On systems supporting non-ASCII single-byte character encodings,
> different c arguments may
So isdigit(3) says in the first paragraph that
'The complete list of decimal digits is 0 and 1-9, in any locale.'
Later on it says:
'On systems supporting non-ASCII single-byte character encodings,
different c arguments may correspond to the digits, and the results of
isdigit() may depend on
