Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> On 16-03-13 11:11 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> >It seems that chown(1) will write to a file even if it already has the
> >desired ownership. The below patch causes it to skip the write when
> >there would be no change. The best I could tell, the fts_read(3) and
> >fchow
On 16-03-13 11:11 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
It seems that chown(1) will write to a file even if it already has the
desired ownership. The below patch causes it to skip the write when
there would be no change. The best I could tell, the fts_read(3) and
fchownat(3) logic agree on whether to fo
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> It seems that chown(1) will write to a file even if it already has the
> desired ownership. The below patch causes it to skip the write when
> there would be no change. The best I could tell, the fts_read(3) and
> fchownat(3) logic agree
It seems that chown(1) will write to a file even if it already has the
desired ownership. The below patch causes it to skip the write when
there would be no change. The best I could tell, the fts_read(3) and
fchownat(3) logic agree on whether to follow symlinks in all cases, so
there's no need to e
