On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:05:38AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:49:55PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 18:59 -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
> > > RFC 4861 specifies ReachableTime "should be a uniformly distributed
> > > random value between
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:49:55PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 18:59 -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
> > RFC 4861 specifies ReachableTime "should be a uniformly distributed
> > random value between MIN_RANDOM_FACTOR and MAX_RANDOM_FACTOR times
> > BaseReachableTime
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:49:55PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 18:59 -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
> > RFC 4861 specifies ReachableTime "should be a uniformly distributed
> > random value between MIN_RANDOM_FACTOR and MAX_RANDOM_FACTOR times
> > BaseReachableTime
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 18:59 -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
> RFC 4861 specifies ReachableTime "should be a uniformly distributed
> random value between MIN_RANDOM_FACTOR and MAX_RANDOM_FACTOR times
> BaseReachableTime milliseconds." I think the author intended to do the
> multiplication by (x>>10)
ping
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 06:59:12PM -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
> RFC 4861 specifies ReachableTime "should be a uniformly distributed
> random value between MIN_RANDOM_FACTOR and MAX_RANDOM_FACTOR times
> BaseReachableTime milliseconds." I think the author intended to do the
> multiplication