On 25/01/17(Wed) 15:52, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I have the same diff.
>
> It does not help the pr_usrreq path though.
Sure but, let's do baby step. :)
> >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02:22AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> >> splassert: yield: want 0 have 1
> >> Starting stack trace...
> >> yield() at
I have the same diff.
It does not help the pr_usrreq path though.
>On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02:22AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
>> splassert: yield: want 0 have 1
>> Starting stack trace...
>> yield() at yield+0xac
>> pool_get() at pool_get+0x1ca
>> socreate() at socreate+0xba
>> sys_socket() at
On 25/01/17(Wed) 19:04, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02:22AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> > splassert: yield: want 0 have 1
> > Starting stack trace...
> > yield() at yield+0xac
> > pool_get() at pool_get+0x1ca
> > socreate() at socreate+0xba
> > sys_socket() at
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:04:19PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02:22AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> > splassert: yield: want 0 have 1
> > Starting stack trace...
> > yield() at yield+0xac
> > pool_get() at pool_get+0x1ca
> > socreate() at socreate+0xba
> > sys_socket()
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:02:22AM -0500, David Hill wrote:
> splassert: yield: want 0 have 1
> Starting stack trace...
> yield() at yield+0xac
> pool_get() at pool_get+0x1ca
> socreate() at socreate+0xba
> sys_socket() at sys_socket+0x135
> syscall() at syscall+0x27b
> --- syscall (number 97) ---
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:32:25PM +1000, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I just enabled the NET_LOCK() again and I'm looking for test reports.
> Please go build a kernel from sources or wait for the next snapshot,
> run it and report back.
>
> If you're looking for some small coding tasks related to
