Re: New installer - initial user creation

2009-06-28 Thread Alexander Hall
Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:09:27 + > "Thordur I. Bjornsson" wrote: >> viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200 >> >>> Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root >>> replacement", shouldn't he be added to staff login class ? >> Yes, I'd actua

Re: New installer - initial user creation

2009-06-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:09:27 + "Thordur I. Bjornsson" wrote: > viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200 > > > Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root > > replacement", shouldn't he be added to staff login class ? > > Yes, I'd actually love that. Then I c

Re: New installer - initial user creation

2009-06-26 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 03:12:52PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote: > > > viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200 > > > > > Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root > > > replacement", shouldn't he be added to

Re: New installer - initial user creation

2009-06-26 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote: > viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200 > > > Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root > > replacement", shouldn't he be added to staff login class ? > > Yes, I'd actually love that. Then I could use it. >

Re: New installer - initial user creation

2009-06-26 Thread Thordur I. Bjornsson
viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200 > Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root > replacement", shouldn't he be added to staff login class ? Yes, I'd actually love that. Then I could use it. krw ?