On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:04:03PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 25 January 2016 at 01:38, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> > Not certain if this is debug output put there intentionally or
>
> Yes.
>
> > if this is some error condition?
>
> It is. Transmission is stuck and these
On 25 January 2016 at 01:38, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> tech@,
>
> I've uploaded a few of the dmesgs gathered to dmesgd.nycbug.org:
>
> http://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?action=dmesgd=index=Jonathon
>
> Currently I have m4.10xlarge, c4.8xlarge, m3.medium, and t2.nano
> uploaded
Hi Jonathon,
Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this.
On 24 January 2016 at 06:49, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:18:17PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
>> Speaking of testing, is there any particular area non-devs could
>> assist with at this time?
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this.
>
No, thank you guys for all of the work you're doing to get
this working. I'm just a user heh.
>
> Trying newer kernels would be the most helpful. I've just
On 24 January 2016 at 20:55, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> Hi Jonathon,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this.
>>
> No, thank you guys for all of the work you're doing to get
> this working. I'm just a
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:08:32PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 24 January 2016 at 20:55, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> Hi Jonathon,
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this.
> >>
> > No, thank
> On 23.01.2016, at 12:12, Anders Berggren wrote:
>
>> On 06 Jan 2016, at 18:49, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> - I didn't work on m4.10xlarge (see cvs:~reyk/dmesg.m4.10xlarge).
>
> I didn’t see any mentions of it in the dmesg
>
> On 06 Jan 2016, at 18:49, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> - I didn't work on m4.10xlarge (see cvs:~reyk/dmesg.m4.10xlarge).
I didn’t see any mentions of it in the dmesg
https://gist.github.com/reyk/b372af303eb86bab3fee but could it be that those
machine classes (*x*large-ish) uses
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image.
>
> Machines with the Intel NIC will not show any netfront in the device list via
> XenStore (just try Ubuntu).
>
> Reyk
That's correct, but I think what was being pointed out is that
> On 23.01.2016, at 22:27, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image.
>>
>> Machines with the Intel NIC will not show any netfront in the device list
>> via XenStore (just try
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:57:21PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
> > On 23.01.2016, at 22:27, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> >> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image.
> >>
> >> Machines with the Intel NIC
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:18:17PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> Speaking of testing, is there any particular area non-devs could
> assist with at this time? Gathering dmesgs for different instance
> types?
>
I decided to spin up one of each instance type and grab the console
output in case it
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 7 January 2016 at 13:17, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Mike Belopuhov
> >> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:02:23 +0100
> >>
> >> On 6 January 2016 at 17:58, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >> > On
> From: Mike Belopuhov
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:02:23 +0100
>
> On 6 January 2016 at 17:58, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >
> >> There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably
> >> (at least on
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 16:37 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably
> (at least on modern Xen) so I'd like to get it in. Man page will
> follow.
>
> OK?
>
Just noticed that a couple of debug printfs have sneaked in.
I'm not going to
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:37:36PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably
> (at least on modern Xen) so I'd like to get it in. Man page will
> follow.
>
> OK?
>
I can see it works now and as mentioned in icb:
I just had the first
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably
> (at least on modern Xen) so I'd like to get it in. Man page will
> follow.
I only had a quick glance at the code, but I have one comment about your
use of memory barriers. The
17 matches
Mail list logo