Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-25 Thread Jonathon Sisson
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:04:03PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 25 January 2016 at 01:38, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > > Not certain if this is debug output put there intentionally or > > Yes. > > > if this is some error condition? > > It is. Transmission is stuck and these

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-25 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 25 January 2016 at 01:38, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > tech@, > > I've uploaded a few of the dmesgs gathered to dmesgd.nycbug.org: > > http://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?action=dmesgd=index=Jonathon > > Currently I have m4.10xlarge, c4.8xlarge, m3.medium, and t2.nano > uploaded

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-24 Thread Mike Belopuhov
Hi Jonathon, Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this. On 24 January 2016 at 06:49, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:18:17PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote: >> Speaking of testing, is there any particular area non-devs could >> assist with at this time?

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-24 Thread Jonathon Sisson
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > Hi Jonathon, > > Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this. > No, thank you guys for all of the work you're doing to get this working. I'm just a user heh. > > Trying newer kernels would be the most helpful. I've just

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-24 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 24 January 2016 at 20:55, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> Hi Jonathon, >> >> Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this. >> > No, thank you guys for all of the work you're doing to get > this working. I'm just a

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-24 Thread Jonathon Sisson
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 09:08:32PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 24 January 2016 at 20:55, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:16:37PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > >> Hi Jonathon, > >> > >> Thanks a lot for taking your time to test this. > >> > > No, thank

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-23 Thread Reyk Floeter
> On 23.01.2016, at 12:12, Anders Berggren wrote: > >> On 06 Jan 2016, at 18:49, Reyk Floeter wrote: >> - I didn't work on m4.10xlarge (see cvs:~reyk/dmesg.m4.10xlarge). > > I didn’t see any mentions of it in the dmesg >

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-23 Thread Anders Berggren
> On 06 Jan 2016, at 18:49, Reyk Floeter wrote: > - I didn't work on m4.10xlarge (see cvs:~reyk/dmesg.m4.10xlarge). I didn’t see any mentions of it in the dmesg https://gist.github.com/reyk/b372af303eb86bab3fee but could it be that those machine classes (*x*large-ish) uses

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-23 Thread Jonathon Sisson
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: > No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image. > > Machines with the Intel NIC will not show any netfront in the device list via > XenStore (just try Ubuntu). > > Reyk That's correct, but I think what was being pointed out is that

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-23 Thread Reyk Floeter
> On 23.01.2016, at 22:27, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: >> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image. >> >> Machines with the Intel NIC will not show any netfront in the device list >> via XenStore (just try

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-23 Thread Jonathon Sisson
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:57:21PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > On 23.01.2016, at 22:27, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:19:29PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: > >> No, you have to *enable* SR-IOV in the image. > >> > >> Machines with the Intel NIC

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-23 Thread Jonathon Sisson
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 02:18:17PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote: > Speaking of testing, is there any particular area non-devs could > assist with at this time? Gathering dmesgs for different instance > types? > I decided to spin up one of each instance type and grab the console output in case it

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-12 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 7 January 2016 at 13:17, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> From: Mike Belopuhov > >> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:02:23 +0100 > >> > >> On 6 January 2016 at 17:58, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > >> > On

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-07 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Mike Belopuhov > Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:02:23 +0100 > > On 6 January 2016 at 17:58, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > > >> There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably > >> (at least on

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-06 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 16:37 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably > (at least on modern Xen) so I'd like to get it in. Man page will > follow. > > OK? > Just noticed that a couple of debug printfs have sneaked in. I'm not going to

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-06 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:37:36PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably > (at least on modern Xen) so I'd like to get it in. Man page will > follow. > > OK? > I can see it works now and as mentioned in icb: I just had the first

Re: Xen virtual network (Netfront) driver

2016-01-06 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > There's still stuff to do, but it receives and transmits reliably > (at least on modern Xen) so I'd like to get it in. Man page will > follow. I only had a quick glance at the code, but I have one comment about your use of memory barriers. The