Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-08-01 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 18:23:08 +1000 > From: Jonathan Matthew > Cc: tech@openbsd.org > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:29:31PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:06:14AM +0200, Mark Kettenis

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-08-01 Thread Jan Stary
On Aug 01 18:23:08, jonat...@d14n.org wrote: > Much better theory: the acpicpu_sc array has MAXCPUS elements, but on this > system (and all R6415s, as far as I can tell) we have more acpicpu devices > than that. I suppose we should just make acpicpu_match fail if cf->cf_unit > is >= MAXCPUS as we

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-08-01 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:29:31PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:06:14AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:38:55 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Date:

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-29 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:06:14AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:38:55 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:46 +1000 > > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-29 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:38:55 +1000 > From: Jonathan Matthew > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:46 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:46 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Bryan Steele
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:44:33PM -0400, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > hello, > > On 2020-07-28 11:12, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, On 2020-07-28 11:12, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > > > > > Recent

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:46 +1000 > From: Jonathan Matthew > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Bryan Steele
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:09:51PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:16:56 +0100 > > From: Jason McIntyre > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:16:56 +0100 > From: Jason McIntyre > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Date:

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > > From: Jonathan Matthew > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-28 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:46:34 +1000 > From: Jonathan Matthew > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > >

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > > diff

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > > diff

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:10:42 -0400 > From: Bryan Steele > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > > diff tries to

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:02:41 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If > you see

Re: acpicpu(4) and ACPI0007

2020-07-27 Thread Bryan Steele
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Recent ACPI versions have deprecated "Processor()" nodes in favout of > "Device()" nodes with a _HID() method that returns "ACPI0007". This > diff tries to support machines with firmware that implements this. If > you see something